2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10964-006-9095-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Sides of the Same Coin? The Relations between Prosocial and Physically Aggressive Behaviors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
45
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(81 reference statements)
5
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a third meta-analysis (Eisenberg & Lennon, 1983), females were found to consistently report higher empathy than males; these differences were particularly pronounced in adults, where the mean effect size, d = .99, suggested a very large sex difference in empathy. More recent studies have corroborated these results with sex differences reported in college students (McGinley & Carlo, 2007) and adolescents (Carlo, Raffaelli, Laible, & Meyer, 1999). …”
supporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a third meta-analysis (Eisenberg & Lennon, 1983), females were found to consistently report higher empathy than males; these differences were particularly pronounced in adults, where the mean effect size, d = .99, suggested a very large sex difference in empathy. More recent studies have corroborated these results with sex differences reported in college students (McGinley & Carlo, 2007) and adolescents (Carlo, Raffaelli, Laible, & Meyer, 1999). …”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…This combined scale has been typically used in past research, and has shown high internal reliability, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from .82 to .85 (Carlo et al, 1999;McGinley & Carlo, 2007). In this study, the alpha coefficient of the combined scale was .76.…”
Section: Empathymentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Other research findings related to gender differences in prosocial behaviors indicate that females tend to engage more often in emotional, altruistic and compliant prosocial behaviors than males, mainly because they are more empathetic. On the other hand, males are prone to engage more readily in public prosocial behaviors (McGinley & Carlo, 2007). As with the controversy surrounding the gender effect, in a more recent study Eagly (2009) found that although men and women did not differ in the levels of involvement in prosocial behaviors, they are different in the way of preference of particular categories of these actions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extension of this period might cause identity formation of the patient and addition of other mental disorders; thus causing lower response to treatment and unfavorable prognosis. Also, untreated CD is suggested as the cause of somatization, anxiety disorder or personality disorder in adult life 19,22,23 . Considering our finding that adolescents with CD arrive to other pediatric departments, clinicians in other departments must be informed about this disorder.…”
Section: Cmjmentioning
confidence: 99%