2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2201.10319
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two sides of the same coin: sterile neutrinos and dark radiation. Status and perspectives

Maria Archidiacono,
Stefano Gariazzo

Abstract: The presence of light sterile neutrinos is one of the unanswered questions of particle physics. The cosmological counterpart is represented by dark radiation, i.e. any form of radiation present in the early Universe besides photons and standard (active) neutrinos. This short review provides a comprehensive overview of the two problems and of their connection. We review the status of neutrino oscillation anomalies, commenting on the most recent oscillation data and their mutual tensions, and we discuss the cons… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, allowing a non-standard lensing amplitude A lens = 1 in the cosmological model, we do not observe great changes in the consistency between the two experiments and estimate a global tension of about 2.6 σ, close to the ΛCDM result. On the other hand, considering the possibility of non-flat background geometries or a non-standard Dark Energy equation of state, the tension between Planck and ACT-DR4 slightly reduces to ∼ 2.3 σ. Conversely, other extensions involv-2 In the case of three active massless neutrinos, the Standard Model of particle physics predicts N eff = 3.044 [51][52][53][54][55][56] while larger (smaller) values are possible if additional (less) relativistic degrees of freedom are present in the early Universe (see, e.g., Refs [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66] and the references therein).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, allowing a non-standard lensing amplitude A lens = 1 in the cosmological model, we do not observe great changes in the consistency between the two experiments and estimate a global tension of about 2.6 σ, close to the ΛCDM result. On the other hand, considering the possibility of non-flat background geometries or a non-standard Dark Energy equation of state, the tension between Planck and ACT-DR4 slightly reduces to ∼ 2.3 σ. Conversely, other extensions involv-2 In the case of three active massless neutrinos, the Standard Model of particle physics predicts N eff = 3.044 [51][52][53][54][55][56] while larger (smaller) values are possible if additional (less) relativistic degrees of freedom are present in the early Universe (see, e.g., Refs [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66] and the references therein).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, it is possible to completely change this constraint by relaxing the assumption of free-streaming. In fact, CMB data are powerful to test new secret interactions of neutrinos since these interactions affect the streaming properties of neutrinos [855][856][857][858][859][860][861]. As a striking example, Planck 2015 temperature data can fully accommodate 4 species of strongly interacting neutrinos through a contact interaction, with H 0 = 72.3 ± 1.4 km/s/Mpc [859,[862][863][864][865].…”
Section: Ingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…interacting DR [861,868,879], evaporating PBHs [880] -see review [822]). Additionally, models involving interacting dark radiation produced around matter-radiation equality (for instance following the decoupling of heavy particles from the thermal bath) can perform significantly better (and in fact are even favored by Planck data) than standard interacting dark radiation scenarios (present from early times), as shown recently in Ref.…”
Section: Ingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2,6,11] for discussion), these discrepancies might be the first clue about the intrinsic nature of the ΛCDM dark sector. On the one hand, the resolution of the Hubble tension most likely involves new physics in the pre-recombination era, through a decrease of the sound horizon before recombination [12][13][14][15][16][17], such as model involving dark radiation and/or new neutrino properties [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], early dark energy [28][29][30][31][32][33], modified gravity [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] or exotic recombination [54][55][56][57]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%