2018
DOI: 10.1257/mic.20150147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Sided Investment and Matching with Multidimensional Cost Types and Attributes

Abstract: Heterogeneous buyers and sellers must make investments before entering a continuum assignment market. I show that efficient ex post contracting equilibria (Cole, Mailath, and Postlewaite 2001b) exist in a general assignment game framework. I then shed light on what enables and what precludes coordination failures. A simple condition—absence of technological multiplicity—guarantees efficient investments for each pair, but a mismatch of agents may still occur. However, using optimal transport theory, I also show… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature investigating the efficiency of investments under competitive matching (e.g., Cole, Mailath, and Postlewaite 2001b;Peters and Siow 2002;Samuelson 2013 and2017;Nöldeke and Samuelson 2015;Chiappori, Salanié, and Weiss 2017;Chiappori, Dias, and Meghir 2018;Dizdar 2018) focuses on markets featuring a continuum of price-taking agents on each side to turn off the holdup problem and investigate other sources of investment inefficiencies-like coordination failures, participation constraints, and imper-fect information. Our results provide non-cooperative foundations in finite markets for this widely used price-taking assumption, and shows that dynamic entry can be an important force behind price-taking behavior.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature investigating the efficiency of investments under competitive matching (e.g., Cole, Mailath, and Postlewaite 2001b;Peters and Siow 2002;Samuelson 2013 and2017;Nöldeke and Samuelson 2015;Chiappori, Salanié, and Weiss 2017;Chiappori, Dias, and Meghir 2018;Dizdar 2018) focuses on markets featuring a continuum of price-taking agents on each side to turn off the holdup problem and investigate other sources of investment inefficiencies-like coordination failures, participation constraints, and imper-fect information. Our results provide non-cooperative foundations in finite markets for this widely used price-taking assumption, and shows that dynamic entry can be an important force behind price-taking behavior.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, γ M > 0 and γ W = 1 − γ M > 0 are constants, and δ M : R + → R + and δ W : R + → R + are non-decreasing, concave, twice continuously differentiable and satisfy δ M (0) = 0 and δ W (0) = 0. 7 The net utility of an unmatched man (woman) with investment β M (β W ) is given by −β M (−β W ).…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the complete information models of Peters (2007) and Bashkar and Hopkins (2016), the external benefits enter agents' utilities additively, and are modeled via the non-decreasing and type-independent functions δ M and δ W . 8 7 Large parts of our basic equilibrium characterization, including the existence result of Theorem 2 (if the limit conditions are replaced by analogous conditions about limit superiors) apply for arbitrary non-decreasing functions δ M and δ W , but as all our other quantitative results pertain to linear or concave benefits, we focus on this case from the outset. 8 We could easily replace γ M mw and γ W mw by arbitrary smooth and strictly supermodular functions.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%