1999
DOI: 10.1080/03461230050131894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Sided Bounds for Ruin Probabilities when the Adjustment Coefficient does not Exist

Abstract: Two-sided bounds for ruin probabilities when the adjustment coefficient does not exist. Scand. Actuarial J. 1999; 1: 80-92.In this paper, we derive two-sided bounds for the ruin probability in the compound Poisson risk model when the adjustment coefficient of the individual claim size distribution does not exist. These bounds also apply directly to the tails of compound geometric distributions. The upper bound is tighter than that of Dickson (1994). The corresponding lower bound, which holds under the same con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The following result generalizes a result by Cai and Garrido (1999a), concerning two-sided bounds for the compound geometric tail (and thus for the ruin probability in the renewal risk model) ψ(x).…”
Section: Two-sided Bounds Using a Truncated Lundberg Conditionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The following result generalizes a result by Cai and Garrido (1999a), concerning two-sided bounds for the compound geometric tail (and thus for the ruin probability in the renewal risk model) ψ(x).…”
Section: Two-sided Bounds Using a Truncated Lundberg Conditionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Then κ x exists uniquely for every positive x and, if κ exists, lim x→∞ κ x = κ (Cai and Garrido, 1999a). The following result generalizes a result by Cai and Garrido (1999a), concerning two-sided bounds for the compound geometric tail (and thus for the ruin probability in the renewal risk model) ψ(x).…”
Section: Two-sided Bounds Using a Truncated Lundberg Conditionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, in Table 17, the bound U CP is the upper bound for the ruin probability given in Theorem 4.5 of Chadjiconstantinidis and Politis (2005), while the bounds U 1 , U 2 and U 3 are those obtained from (36) for n = 1, 2, 3 and using U (u) = U CP (u) as our initial bound. The last column gives the upper bound from Cai and Garrido (1999). For small values of u, our upper bounds perform better than the initial upper bound U CP (u).…”
Section: Numerical Illustrationsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…If u/β k+1 > 0, then we proceed as follows. According to Cai and Garrido (1999), if q ∈ (0, 1) and 0 < s < ∞ then…”
Section: This Is Equal Tomentioning
confidence: 99%