2017
DOI: 10.1145/3072959.3126835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-scale topology optimization with microstructures

Abstract: Fig. 1. Our two-scale topology optimization framework allows to optimize continuous material properties mapping to printable microstructures (le ) to fabricate high-resolution functional objects (middle) and minimum compliant structures (right).In this paper we present a novel two-scale framework to optimize the structure and the material distribution of an object given its functional specications. Our approach utilizes multi-material microstructures as low-level building blocks of the object. We start by prec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different from two-scale structural optimizations (e.g. [11], [1]) which assume axis-aligned microstructures, our method optimizes the orientation of microstructures, in particular, to align it with spatially-varying stress directions. We restrict our design method to lightweight microstructures that are composed of struts, i.e.…”
Section: Structural Optimization For 3d Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different from two-scale structural optimizations (e.g. [11], [1]) which assume axis-aligned microstructures, our method optimizes the orientation of microstructures, in particular, to align it with spatially-varying stress directions. We restrict our design method to lightweight microstructures that are composed of struts, i.e.…”
Section: Structural Optimization For 3d Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design of lightweight structures by optimization is a classical and still active topic in engineering. Stimulated by the increasingly high flexibility and resolution offered by 3D printing, there has been a growing interest in optimizing structures that are composed of delicate microstructures [1], [2]. These approaches assume that the microstructures are aligned with a prescribed regular grid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And based on these two, (3) how do we search for a good design? Challenges in answering these questions include high-dimensional or ill-defined design spaces such as for topologies [10,11], material microstructures [12,13,14], or complex geometries [15,16], expensive evaluations of designs and their sensitivities, e.g., due to model nonlinearity [17,18], coupled materials or physics [19,20,21], or subjective goodness measures [22,23], or search inefficiency due to the absence of sensitivities [24,25,26] or the existence of random variables [27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Design for fabrication A large body of work has investigated optimization techniques offering design aids to create shapes that meet the prescribed structural objectives and fabrication constraints [LEM*17]. Recent examples include designing for deformation behavior [BBO*10; STC*13; PZM*15; MZL*17], meta‐materials [ZKBT17; MHSL18; IFW*16; ZSCM17], and lightweighting [Ben89; LSZ*14; WLQ*17]. Broader methods that can handle variety of requirements have also been investigated in [CLD*13; CBN*15; MHR*16; SXZ*17].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%