Two's Company: Self-Disclosure and Reciprocity in Triads Versus Dyads

Solano, Cecilia H.; Dunnam, Mina

doi:10.2307/3033613

Cited by 41 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In particular, it has been found that the bigger the group size is, the shallower the quality of the group size is (Solano & Dunnam, 1985). In contrast to these results, there does not appear to be any evidence supporting the idea that group size influences selfdisclosure over personal Web space.…”

Section: Voluntary Self-disclosurecontrasting

confidence: 51%

Voluntary self‐disclosure of information on the Internet: A multimethod study of the motivations and consequences of disclosing information on blogs

Lee¹,

Taylor

2008

Psychology and Marketing

158

143

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As marketing paradigms have shifted toward the need to build a relationship with consumers, marketers need to facilitate two-way communications in order to better understand them. The ability of marketers to glean the types of detailed information needed often depends on the consumer's willingness to volunteer such information. Given consumer concern about privacy as well as skepticism about how marketers use data, it is important to understand how consumers make decisions with regard to self-disclosure of information. In spite of the widespread concern about privacy, many consumers are willing to engage in significant disclosure of various Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 25 The purpose of this study is to examine the psychological characteristics of consumers who engage in voluntary self-disclosure. Through the use of the multimethod approach, we identify seven motivations individuals have for voluntary self-disclosure, as well as three consequences of this behavior. We also examine the structural configurations of the relationship among motivations, voluntary self-disclosure, and consequences. Results suggest that the motives identified help to explain why some individuals self-disclose and that individuals perceive that there are three major consequences of self-disclosure, two of which are positive.

show abstract

Section: Voluntary Self-disclosurecontrasting

confidence: 51%

Voluntary self‐disclosure of information on the Internet: A multimethod study of the motivations and consequences of disclosing information on blogs

Lee¹,

Taylor

2008

Psychology and Marketing

158

143

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In fact, fewer than 5% of patients in this study indicated that their companion had either told the physician something that they didn't want the physician to know or that there was something they hesitated to tell the physician because the companion was present. Several previous studies have suggested that the presence of a companion could result in a loss of intimacy or jeopardize patient privacy [20,21]. The disclosure of sensitive issues, including those that might relate to the caregiver, can be especially problematic [22].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Patients’ perceptions of visit companions’ helpfulness during Japanese geriatric medical visits

Ishikawa¹,

Roter²,

Yamazaki³

et al. 2006

Patient Education and Counseling

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Our teams consisted of only two individuals. It has been suggested that the team process dynamics of dyads may be different from those of larger teams composed of 3 or more team members (Littlepage & Silbiger, 1992;Solano & Dunnam, 1985). For instance, with larger teams, we would expect the correlations between the additive and referent-shift consensus operationalizations to be much smaller.…”

Section: Limitations and Suggestions For Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 91%

A Longitudinal Examination of the Comparative Criterion-Related Validity of Additive and Referent-Shift Consensus Operationalizations of Team Efficacy

Arthur

Bell

Edwards

2007

Organizational Research Methods

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using a longitudinal design, the authors examined the criterion-related validity of two operationalizations of task-specific team efficacy that differed in their approximation to the level of analysis of the criterion, team performance. Data were obtained from 85 highly interdependent dyadic teams trained over a 2-week period to perform a complex perceptual-motor skill task. Results indicated that, as expected, the operationalization with a team-level referent (referent-shift consensus) was superior to the operationalization with an individual-level referent (additive) across all three data collection periods. For the referent-shift consensus operationalization, within-team agreement and the criterion-related validity improved between the first and second data collection periods but not between the second and third. However, for both operationalizations, despite the increased strength of the team efficacy and team performance relationships, efficacy ratings collected later in the study protocol did not explain unique variance in subsequent team performance once the effect of previous performance was statistically controlled.

show abstract

Two's Company: Self-Disclosure and Reciprocity in Triads Versus Dyads

Cited by 41 publications

References 8 publications

Voluntary self‐disclosure of information on the Internet: A multimethod study of the motivations and consequences of disclosing information on blogs

Voluntary self‐disclosure of information on the Internet: A multimethod study of the motivations and consequences of disclosing information on blogs

Patients’ perceptions of visit companions’ helpfulness during Japanese geriatric medical visits

A Longitudinal Examination of the Comparative Criterion-Related Validity of Additive and Referent-Shift Consensus Operationalizations of Team Efficacy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About