1989
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0097332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two remarks about analytic sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a similar argument and the Silver Theorem [10, 35.20] one can show that ideals generated by an coanalytic equivalence relation with uncountable many equivalence classes (i.e., ideals of sets which can be covered by countably many equivalence classes) have property (M). By 14 the same holds for the ideal of subsets of the plane which can be covered by countably many lines. There are other σ‐ideals with property (M): ideals on Polish spaces with a \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\begin{document}\pagestyle{empty}$\Sigma ^0_2$\end{document} base which are not ccc (see 12), some ideals defined by translations (see 2 and 13).…”
Section: Fubini Productsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Using a similar argument and the Silver Theorem [10, 35.20] one can show that ideals generated by an coanalytic equivalence relation with uncountable many equivalence classes (i.e., ideals of sets which can be covered by countably many equivalence classes) have property (M). By 14 the same holds for the ideal of subsets of the plane which can be covered by countably many lines. There are other σ‐ideals with property (M): ideals on Polish spaces with a \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\begin{document}\pagestyle{empty}$\Sigma ^0_2$\end{document} base which are not ccc (see 12), some ideals defined by translations (see 2 and 13).…”
Section: Fubini Productsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In [3] it was proved that if an analytic set on the real plane cannot be covered by countably many lines then it contains a perfect set which also cannot be covered by countably many lines. We can generalize this in the following.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 98%
“…X / ∈ J -in this case we say that (n, F )-system S is proper. 3 be a set of all non-collinear triples. Then Y is a Polish subspace as an open subset of (X) 3 :…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these cases define clopen neighbourhoods of 1 A disjoint from {1 B : B ∈ A}, as required. Now we step up the cardinality dichotomy for Borel subsets of 2 N to its square 2 N × 2 N , using a result from [18] of van Engelen, Kunen and Miller. Lemma 31.…”
Section: Borel Structure Matrices and Almost Disjoint Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%