1991
DOI: 10.1002/poc.610040508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two reintroduced solvatochromic indicators for hydrogen bond donation and acceptance

Abstract: The behaviour of cis‐dicyanodi‐1‐10‐phenanthrolinoiron(II) and acetylacetonato‐N, N,N′,N′‐tetramethylethylene‐diaminocopper(II) perchlorate as solvatochromic indicators for the ability of solvents to donate a hydrogen atom or a pair of electrons, respectively, towards the formation of a hydrogen bond is examined by multivariable linear regressions and principal component analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, in pure solvents it is known that the [Cu(acac)(tmen)] + structure has the octahedral geometry shown in structure I in the Scheme 2 [1]. Spange et al [7] have studied the solvatochromism of the [Cu(acac)(tmen)] + visible absorption band, and they have demonstrated that the band shifts bathochromically when the electron donor ability of the solvent, measured through the Kamlet and Taft b parameter [10] and/or the Gutman's donor number (DN) [3,14], increases [1,3,15]. For example, a band at k max around 500 nm is observed in the nonelectron-donating dichloroethane, whereas in the strongly electron-donating solvent piperidine, the k max peaks around 686 nm [3,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, in pure solvents it is known that the [Cu(acac)(tmen)] + structure has the octahedral geometry shown in structure I in the Scheme 2 [1]. Spange et al [7] have studied the solvatochromism of the [Cu(acac)(tmen)] + visible absorption band, and they have demonstrated that the band shifts bathochromically when the electron donor ability of the solvent, measured through the Kamlet and Taft b parameter [10] and/or the Gutman's donor number (DN) [3,14], increases [1,3,15]. For example, a band at k max around 500 nm is observed in the nonelectron-donating dichloroethane, whereas in the strongly electron-donating solvent piperidine, the k max peaks around 686 nm [3,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Solvatochromic properties of the indicators Fe(phen) 2 (CN) 2 ,37–41 Michlers ketone,40–42 and 4‐aminobenzophenone22,43 as well as the theoretical background and procedure for the determination of LSE relationships were already reported in detail 9,40,44…”
Section: Experimental Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acceptor numbers ( AN ) of Gutmann17 for solvents are calculated by means of Equation (5) using the solvatochromism of Fe(phen) 2 (CN) 2 39,41 …”
Section: Experimental Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(10) [10] as well as into other useful solvent polarity scales such as the acceptor number (AN) and donor number (DN) scale Full Paper: The empirical Kamlet-Taft solvatochromic polarity parameters a, b, and p* as well as calculated Reichardt's E T (30) values are presented for microcristalline cellulose, cellobiose, chitine, amylose, amylopectine, and glycogene. For this purpose, the following solvatochromic polarity indicators were applied: 2,6-diphenyl-4-(2,4,6-triphenyl-1-pyridinio)phenolate (1), [4,Ndimethylamino)benzophenone] (2), dicyano-bis(1,10-phenanthroline) iron(II) [Fe(phen) 2 ](CN) 2 (3), and 4-aminobenzophenone (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%