2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-017-1216-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two QTL characterized for soft scald and soggy breakdown in apple (Malus × domestica) through pedigree-based analysis of a large population of interconnected families

Abstract: Soft scald and soggy breakdown are important postharvest physiological disorders of apple (Malus × domestica). 'Honeycrisp' and some of its offspring are particularly susceptible to developing these disorders. The purpose of this study was to identify molecular markers associated with high incidences of soft scald and soggy breakdown for use in marker-assisted breeding. Towards this aim, we employed a pedigree-based approach using mostly germplasm related to 'Honeycrisp.' Two quantitative trait loci (QTL) were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These high estimates signified a large opportunity to identify the underlying genetic factors segregating in this germplasm. While it is difficult to harvest apple fruit in a standardized manner from genetically variable populations (Evans et al 2012;Howard et al 2018), the high heritability estimates obtained indicate that any discrepancies in determining standardized maturity across trees within and among years were minimal for fruit acidity compared to genetic influences. Kouassi et al (2009) reported narrow-sense heritabilities for four storage treatments of 0.79 ± 0.01 to 0.81 ± 0.01 for TA on 2207 pedigreed individuals in 29 families from breeding programs of six European countries.…”
Section: General Genetic Influences On Fruit Acidity From Harvest Thrmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These high estimates signified a large opportunity to identify the underlying genetic factors segregating in this germplasm. While it is difficult to harvest apple fruit in a standardized manner from genetically variable populations (Evans et al 2012;Howard et al 2018), the high heritability estimates obtained indicate that any discrepancies in determining standardized maturity across trees within and among years were minimal for fruit acidity compared to genetic influences. Kouassi et al (2009) reported narrow-sense heritabilities for four storage treatments of 0.79 ± 0.01 to 0.81 ± 0.01 for TA on 2207 pedigreed individuals in 29 families from breeding programs of six European countries.…”
Section: General Genetic Influences On Fruit Acidity From Harvest Thrmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Bayesian QTL mapping approach implemented by FlexQTL ™ (Bink et al, 2008 andBink et al, 2014) allows analyzing multiple pedigreelinked progenies at the same time; reducing the limitations derived from QTL analyses using single populations. This approach has been successfully used in recent years for QTL analyses of different traits in Rosaceae species, such as sweet cherry (Rosyara et al, 2013), apple (Bink et al, 2014;Guan et al, 2015;Allard et al, 2016;Di Guardo et al, 2017;Howard et al, 2018), peach (Fresnedo-Ramírez et al, 2015;Fresnedo-Ramírez et al, 2016;Hernández Mora et al, 2017), and strawberry (Roach et al, 2016;Mangandi et al, 2017;Anciro et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The software package FlexQTL™ utilizes a Bayesian pedigree-based analyses (PBA) approach for QTL discovery and characterization via the software Pedimap (Voorrips et al 2012 ) and Visual FlexQTL™ (van de Weg et al 2004 , 2015 ) which support the graphical representation of FlexQTL™ outputs (van de Weg et al 2004 ). Loci for economically important traits have been characterized using this software in fruit crops including sweet cherry (Rosyara et al 2013 ; Cai et al 2017 ), peach (Fresnedo-Ramirez et al 2015 , 2016 ; Hernández-Mora et al 2017a , b ) and apple (Allard et al 2016 ; Di Guardo et al 2017 ; Durand et al 2017 ; Howard et al 2017 ; van de Weg et al 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%