2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2018.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two projection methods for the solution of Signorini problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we proved the convergence of Algorithm 3. Moreover, from (35), it follows that the optimal choice for ρ is…”
Section: Proof Of Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, we proved the convergence of Algorithm 3. Moreover, from (35), it follows that the optimal choice for ρ is…”
Section: Proof Of Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we propose a new ADMM [7,21] with an optimal parameter for the unilateral obstacle problem [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], which is based on the extreme eigenvalues of the matrix using the finite difference method (FDM) [6,22,26,32]. The main advantage to this method is the simplicity of selecting the optimal parameter [8,[33][34][35][36][37]. Moreover, the method saves computational time for largescale problems because the iterative matrix is always kept constant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, the non-linear boundary conditions Equation (4) necessitates a specific design [5,10,13,23]. The projection iterative methods [21][22][23] are such approaches. In the next section we provide an heuristic analysis to outline the connections with the switching method [5].…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%