2017
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/aa8585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-probe versus van der Pauw method in studying the piezoresistivity of single-wall carbon nanotube thin films

Abstract: The use of the van der Pauw (VDP) method for characterizing and evaluating the piezoresistive behavior of carbon nanomaterial enabled piezoresistive sensors have not been systematically studied. By using single-wall carbon nanotube (SWCNT) thin films as a model system, herein we report a coupled electrical-mechanical experimental study in conjunction with a multiphysics finite element simulation as well as an analytic analysis to compare the two-probe and VDP testing configuration in evaluating the piezoresist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The piezoresistive behavior and its sensing performance (as strain/force sensor or humidity sensor) of the carbon patterns created by DLWc of NaLS were evaluated by using the electrical-mechanical/humidity ramp protocol previously established in our lab (Figures S1 and S2). ,, During the test, a Q800 dynamic mechanical analyzer with a DMA-RH accessory (TA Instruments) was used to apply the required force or humidity signals to the sample. At the same time, the electrical resistance of the sample was measured by a Keithley 3706A system switch/multimeter equipped with a 3721 dual 1 × 20 multiplexer card at a sampling rate of 1 s –1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The piezoresistive behavior and its sensing performance (as strain/force sensor or humidity sensor) of the carbon patterns created by DLWc of NaLS were evaluated by using the electrical-mechanical/humidity ramp protocol previously established in our lab (Figures S1 and S2). ,, During the test, a Q800 dynamic mechanical analyzer with a DMA-RH accessory (TA Instruments) was used to apply the required force or humidity signals to the sample. At the same time, the electrical resistance of the sample was measured by a Keithley 3706A system switch/multimeter equipped with a 3721 dual 1 × 20 multiplexer card at a sampling rate of 1 s –1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the area sensors (LLAS and CCAS), because of their squared-shape and thin film characteristics, a van der Pauw (vdP) four-probe test configuration was used for the same purpose. A detailed discussion comparing these two methods in evaluating piezoresistive materials can be found in ref . In the two-probe test configuration, two copper wires were glued to the two ends of the line sensor (PLS and DDLS) by using conductive silver adhesive as the electrical contacts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure a shows a prototypical device and Figure b shows its relative resistance change when subjected to a cyclic tensile deformation up to a maximum strain of 10%. The gauge factor (GF = ( R / R 0 – 1)/ε) of the PDMS/PCP flexible strain sensor was estimated to be about 21, which is comparable to the flexible sensors made of other types of carbon materialsgraphene, carbon nanotubes, graphite, and so forth.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%