“…The comparison clearly shows that the designed antenna gives better performance than the other designs, in terms of size, bandwidth, axial ratio, gain, and isolation. It is shown that the designs in [35][36][37]42,44,46] have small sizes, but low isolations, low gains, and narrow bandwidths, while our proposed antenna has the lowest profile and smallest lateral dimensions to achieve good performance. The designs in references [33,38,40,45] suffer from bigger sizes, low isolations, low gains, narrow bandwidths, and the axial ratios are compared to the proposed designs.…”