2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two polysomnographic features of REM sleep behavior disorder: Clinical variations insight for Parkinson's disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[14] Concerning sleep structure changes, TST, SE, N3, NREM, REM, and REM% in the PD group were significantly reduced, while TWT was elevated [Table 4]. These findings were consistent with most reports, [20,21] suggesting that patient with PD sleep abnormalities might result from nerve nuclei degeneration and a subsequent imbalance in neurotransmitters, which further disrupts the physiological sleep-wake cycle. Also, decreased slow-wave sleep may be related to reduced high-amplitude low-frequency δ waves in night-time sleep EEGs caused by the disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…[14] Concerning sleep structure changes, TST, SE, N3, NREM, REM, and REM% in the PD group were significantly reduced, while TWT was elevated [Table 4]. These findings were consistent with most reports, [20,21] suggesting that patient with PD sleep abnormalities might result from nerve nuclei degeneration and a subsequent imbalance in neurotransmitters, which further disrupts the physiological sleep-wake cycle. Also, decreased slow-wave sleep may be related to reduced high-amplitude low-frequency δ waves in night-time sleep EEGs caused by the disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The objective sleep parameters of this early PD cohort were similar to our studies before[ 21 22 ] as TST was 352.6 ± 108.3 min, SE was 60.9% ± 18.3%, SL was 30.6 ± 52.0 min, awakenings (n) was 20.5 ± 9.4, NREM1 was 29.6% ± 18.5%, NREM2 was 42.9% ± 16.0%, NREM3 was 13.1% ± 11.6%, REM was 14.4% ± 9.1%, PLMSI was 31.5 ± 50.1/h, AHI was 9.2 ± 13.5/h, AI was 6.2 ± 11.1/h, HI was 3.0 ± 5.4/h, ODI was 8.6 ± 12.5/h, minimal SaO 2 (%) was 89.3% ± 3.9%, the percentage of time spent at SaO 2 <90% (%) was 1.7% ± 4.2%, and arousal with respiratory events during sleep was 2.5 ± 6.3/h.…”
Section: R Esultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In our study, 26.8% of patients with iRSWA developed iRBD after a mean of 2.6 + 2.2 years; and one patient in this group developed PD two years after RBD. Our findings support that iRSWA may be associated with specific clinical profiles, even in the absence of dream‐enacting behaviors …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%