1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0030-4018(96)00531-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-photon four-wave mixing as a new probe for oxygen atoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
2
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative intensities of the O( 3 P j ) peaks in Figure 2 are quite different from those measured for a similar discharge beam [15] with 2 + 1 REMPI at ∼226 nm, or for a microwave discharge beam with two-photon resonant degenerate four-wave mixing spectroscopy [19], which show a regular decrease in signal on going from j = 2 to j = 1 to j = 0. The 1 + 1' REMPI spectrum in Figure 2, however, is quite irregular, with a particularly weak 3 P 1 peak, and a 3 P 2 peak that is stronger than 3 P 0 .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…The relative intensities of the O( 3 P j ) peaks in Figure 2 are quite different from those measured for a similar discharge beam [15] with 2 + 1 REMPI at ∼226 nm, or for a microwave discharge beam with two-photon resonant degenerate four-wave mixing spectroscopy [19], which show a regular decrease in signal on going from j = 2 to j = 1 to j = 0. The 1 + 1' REMPI spectrum in Figure 2, however, is quite irregular, with a particularly weak 3 P 1 peak, and a 3 P 2 peak that is stronger than 3 P 0 .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…The relative intensities of the O( 3 P j ) peaks in Figure 2 are quite different from those measured for a similar discharge beam [15] with 2 + 1 REMPI at ∼226 nm, or for a microwave discharge beam with two-photon resonant degenerate four-wave mixing spectroscopy [19], which show a regular decrease in signal on going from j = 2 to j = 1 to j = 0. The 1 + 1' REMPI spectrum in Figure 2, however, is quite irregular, with a particularly weak 3 P 1 peak, and a 3 P 0 peak that is stronger than 3 P 2 .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…¡ÐÂÎËÊ, ÄÞÒÑÎÐÇÐÐÞÌ Ä ÓÂÃÑÕÇ [23], ÒÑÍÂÊÂÎ, ÚÕÑ ÒÓË ÑÒÓÇAEÇÎÇÐÐÞØ ÖÔÎÑÄËâØ (ÐÂÒÓËÏÇÓ, ÒÓË ÓÇÅËÔÕÓÂÙËË Ë ÒÑÔÕÓÑÇÐËË ÍÂÓÕ ÓÂÔÒÓÇ-AEÇÎÇÐËâ NO 2 ) £¹££ ÑÍÂÊÞÄÂÇÕÔâ ÒÑÎÇÊÐÑÌ ÂÎßÕÇÓÐÂÕË-ÄÑÌ ÏÇÕÑAEÖ ÎÂÊÇÓÐÑ-ËÐAEÖÙËÓÑÄÂÐÐÑÌ ×ÎÖÑÓÇÔÙÇÐÙËË. ¡ÄÕÑÓÞ ÓÂÃÑÕ [77] …”
Section: °ôðñäðþç ôøçïþ úçõþóçøäñîðñäñåñ äêâëïñAeçìôõäëâ ä äñêãöéAeunclassified