2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c00212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Phase Transport Characteristic of Shale Gas and Water through Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Nanopores

Abstract: Previous attempts to characterize shale gas transport in nanopores are not fully successful due to the fact that the presence of water within shale reservoirs is generally overlooked. In addition, shale is known as a wettability-varying (hydrophilic and hydrophobic) rock depending on various components and maturity grades. Herein, toward this end, we performed a comprehensive study about two-phase transport characteristic of shale gas and water through hydrophilic and hydrophobic nanopores by integrating the m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, current research, regarding water transport through cylindrical nanopores, involves both hydrophilic and hydrophobic scenarios. 32,56,57 excellent match in Figure 3 proves the capacity of the proposed mathematic model, covering a wide range of surface wettability. Also, in light of the urgent shortage regarding hydrophilic effect on nanocone transport capacity, the research in this article can bridge the knowledge gap.…”
Section: Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, current research, regarding water transport through cylindrical nanopores, involves both hydrophilic and hydrophobic scenarios. 32,56,57 excellent match in Figure 3 proves the capacity of the proposed mathematic model, covering a wide range of surface wettability. Also, in light of the urgent shortage regarding hydrophilic effect on nanocone transport capacity, the research in this article can bridge the knowledge gap.…”
Section: Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In the case of investigations toward nanocone opening angle, carbon‐based surface with perfect slip boundary is assumed, possessing the hydrophobic property. In contrast, current research, regarding water transport through cylindrical nanopores, involves both hydrophilic and hydrophobic scenarios 32,56,57 . Therefore, excellent match in Figure 3 proves the capacity of the proposed mathematic model, covering a wide range of surface wettability.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The number of water molecules decreases while gas molecules increase (indicated by the shaded part). Combined with the analysis of 1D and 2D density distribution of gas-water molecules, water and gas molecules form interfacial regions with the 1-99 thickness (1%-99% of bulk gas density) around 0.3 nm [23,26], and we call the interfacial regions as the miscible zone (zone 2). In zone 3, the water molecule number of zone 3 becomes less and is about five or six times less than that in zone 2, but the number of gas molecules reaches its maximum.…”
Section: Model Establishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular dynamics simulation plays an important role in studying the mechanism of gas-water flow in pores. Xu et al [23] performed a comprehensive study on the two-phase transport characteristics of shale gas and water through hydrophilic and hydrophobic nanopores combined with molecular dynamics (MD) simulation and analysis model. Hao et al [24] used nonequilibrium molecular dynamics to simulate the mixed flow behavior of water and methane gas in shale pores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, to have an accurate understanding of gas transport characteristics in nanoporous/microporous media, the molecular dynamic (MD) simulation is also widely applied to understand the gas flow behaviors, as summarized and depicted in one recent review by Yu et al [39,40]. The nanochannels are generally used to mimic the fluids flow confined in shale nanoporous media in these MD simulations [22,41,42]. Since the shale organic matter is mainly composed of carbon atoms and the pore wall is hydrophobic; thus, the graphene sheets, carbon nanotubes, and arrayed carbons are abstracted as organic pore wall materials in numerous previous work [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%