2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2005.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-phase frictional pressure gradient of R236ea, R134a and R410A inside multi-port mini-channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(20 reference statements)
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12c. Cavallini et al [27] observed similar predicting trends when they compared their experimental data of three refrigerants (R236ea, R134a, R410A) in multiport mini channels with Tran et al [26] correlation.…”
Section: Comparison With Micro Scale Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…12c. Cavallini et al [27] observed similar predicting trends when they compared their experimental data of three refrigerants (R236ea, R134a, R410A) in multiport mini channels with Tran et al [26] correlation.…”
Section: Comparison With Micro Scale Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Also, their other study [70] explained R410A pressure drop was significantly lower than R134a ones under the same operating conditions. This difference is mainly due to the different values of the vapor phase density of the two fluids: at 40°C saturation temperature, the R410A vapor density is more than double as compared to R134a.…”
Section: Void Fractionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The results indicate that pressure drop along the test section is very small and two-phase CO2 flow exhibits a higher heat transfer coefficient than that of the single-phase liquid or vapor flow. Cavallini et al (2005) demonstrated the two phase frictional pressure gradient of R236ea, R134a and R410A inside multi-port mini-channels. The results presented cover a wide range of the reduced pressure, from 0.1 up to 0.5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%