2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-phase flow structure assessment based on dynamic image analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is one of the drift flux methods, which allows the determination of the volume fraction (α = W GO /W G ) as the ratio of the apparent gas phase velocity to the actual gas phase velocity. A detailed discussion of this method has been included in the paper [38]. In the reported study, a derivative of the Zuber-Findlay method was applied for calculations of the gas void fraction, that is particularly recommended to use for airlift pumps by Reinemann et al [39].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is one of the drift flux methods, which allows the determination of the volume fraction (α = W GO /W G ) as the ratio of the apparent gas phase velocity to the actual gas phase velocity. A detailed discussion of this method has been included in the paper [38]. In the reported study, a derivative of the Zuber-Findlay method was applied for calculations of the gas void fraction, that is particularly recommended to use for airlift pumps by Reinemann et al [39].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visualization studies of adiabatic, two-phase, gas-liquid flow in vertical channels have been carried out by many authors [31,32]. Quantitative stereology technique was used in this work.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these images, using statistical methods, it is possible to determine the speed of movement of the marker particles and ultimately the speed of the medium in which the particles move. Using multiple-image recording methods, which is the dominant direction of the PIV method application, the mean shift of marker particles is determined using the CCF (Cross-Correlation Function) method [6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%