1997
DOI: 10.1029/97wr01708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two‐phase flow infiltration equations accounting for air entrapment effects

Abstract: Abstract. Water infiltration into the unsaturated zone is potentially affected by air compression ahead of the wetting front. Analytical infiltration equations accounting for air compression, air counterflow, and flow hysteresis in a porous medium were derived on the basis of the Green and Ampt [1911] assumptions. Air compression ahead of the wetting front was predicted using the perfect gas law. The capillary pressure at the wetting front was found to vary between the dynamic water-bubbling value and the dyn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
76
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(22 reference statements)
3
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, all the solutions of the flow equation presented here earlier, which assume that air can move freely within the porous medium and remain practically at atmospheric pressure so that its impact on the movement of water can be neglected, can be applied. However, under conditions of flood irrigation, intense rainfall, and soil column experiments, air can be compressed at the wetting front and beyond and reduce significantly the infiltration rate until it could find a way to escape and release that pressure buildup [Peck, 1965;McWhorter, 1971;Dixon and Linden, 1972;Vachaud et al, 1974;Touma et al, 1984;Wang et al, 1998]. Solving the problem of two-phase flow in porous medium presented an increased interest since oil can replace air in the two-phase definition and thus address practical issues related to the oil industry.…”
Section: Two-phase Flow In Porous Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, all the solutions of the flow equation presented here earlier, which assume that air can move freely within the porous medium and remain practically at atmospheric pressure so that its impact on the movement of water can be neglected, can be applied. However, under conditions of flood irrigation, intense rainfall, and soil column experiments, air can be compressed at the wetting front and beyond and reduce significantly the infiltration rate until it could find a way to escape and release that pressure buildup [Peck, 1965;McWhorter, 1971;Dixon and Linden, 1972;Vachaud et al, 1974;Touma et al, 1984;Wang et al, 1998]. Solving the problem of two-phase flow in porous medium presented an increased interest since oil can replace air in the two-phase definition and thus address practical issues related to the oil industry.…”
Section: Two-phase Flow In Porous Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following [53], the saturated hydraulic conductivity, Observed evapotranspiration rates for wetlands vary greatly from site to site [29]. Here, we set the evaporation rate at E = 2 mm/d and potential transpiration rates of the two plants max max 12 EE  = 6 mm/d (during the marsh surface exposure).…”
Section: Parameters Values Used In the Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil in each layer was assumed to be homogeneous and isotropic. According to Wang et al (1997) Table 1). The lower soil layer was expected to be (near-) saturated over the tidal period.…”
Section: Parameters Values Used In the Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%