2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2011.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two perspectives on multiskilling and product-market volatility

Abstract: We study the effect of product market volatility on a firm's choice between multiskilling and specialization. We construct a theoretical model that captures the tradeoff between multiskilling (which gives greater flexibility to reassign workers in production) and specialization (which provides workers with the expertise to respond to product market signals in their area of specialty). Using data from the 2004 WERS, a nationally-representative cross section of British establishments, we find that greater volati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We replicated that analysis but using a different dependent variable, Multitasking , defined as the percent of workers in the establishment's largest occupational group that actually do jobs other than their own at least once a week, with the same seven response categories as in the preceding footnote. The qualitative result from DeVaro and Farnham () still holds with this alternative dependent variable. For example, in column 2 of table 2, DeVaro and Farnham () find in an ordered probit model on an estimation sample of 1,407 establishments that the incremental effect of the (binary) product market volatility measure on the probability of “no multiskilling” is 0.075, which, from a base probability of 0.40, implies an increase of 19% in the probability of no multiskilling, whereas we found that the incremental effect of product market volatility on the probability of “no multitasking” was 0.102 ( z = 2.01), which, from a base probability of 0.36, implies an increase of 28% in the probability of no multitasking.…”
Section: Testable Implications and Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We replicated that analysis but using a different dependent variable, Multitasking , defined as the percent of workers in the establishment's largest occupational group that actually do jobs other than their own at least once a week, with the same seven response categories as in the preceding footnote. The qualitative result from DeVaro and Farnham () still holds with this alternative dependent variable. For example, in column 2 of table 2, DeVaro and Farnham () find in an ordered probit model on an estimation sample of 1,407 establishments that the incremental effect of the (binary) product market volatility measure on the probability of “no multiskilling” is 0.075, which, from a base probability of 0.40, implies an increase of 19% in the probability of no multiskilling, whereas we found that the incremental effect of product market volatility on the probability of “no multitasking” was 0.102 ( z = 2.01), which, from a base probability of 0.36, implies an increase of 28% in the probability of no multitasking.…”
Section: Testable Implications and Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 66%
“…The preceding testable implication relates to a theoretical and empirical result from DeVaro and Farnham () concerning multiskilling . Using the 2004 British WERS, those authors find that multiskilling is less likely when product market volatility is high.…”
Section: Testable Implications and Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations