Abstract:9 We examine bargaining behavior in a noncooperative game in which players alternate in making and responding to proposals over the division of a given surplus. Although the number of bargaining periods is unlimited and time is not discounted, the bargaining is subject to exogenous breakdown at each period with a fixed probability which is common knowledge. We manipulate three probabilities of breakdown in a between-subjects design that allows comparison with previous studies of two-person bargaining with tim… Show more
“…They find a limited role of intrapersonal comparisons in the bargaining and evidence in support of "inequality aversion as an empirically relevant fairness criterion", concluding that interpersonal criteria seem to be "deeply ingrained in human behavior". Weg et al (1990) and Zwick et al (1992) assess the predictive accuracy of the Rubinstein solution with respect to variations in the discount factor and uncertainty about the bargaining horizon, respectively. Weg et al limit the number of trials until agreement to 20 rounds, resulting in a termination of 7 out of 324 bargaining games in their experiment.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As players are aware of this condition, an alternative approach introduced by Zwick et al (1992) implements the common discount factor as a fixed probability of exogenous breakdown rather than as cost of delay. Mean demands in Zwick et al's experiment were closer to the equal split than to the Rubinstein division.…”
Section: Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ample evidence suggests that at least some people show regard for others, which includes aspects of envy (e.g., Camerer 2003;Cooper & Kagel n.d.;De Bruyn & Bolton 2008;Kohler 2012c;Smith 2008;Zwick et al 1992). Neural Correlates of envy were shown in functional magnetic resonance imaging studies that associated stronger envy with stronger anterior cingulate cortex activation Takahashi et al (2009).…”
Bargainers in an open-ended alternating-offer bargaining situation may perceive envy, a utility loss caused by receiving the smaller share that is modeled in some social preferences in addition to self-interest. I extend Rubinstein (1982)'s original solution of the bargaining problem for two self-interested bargainers to this strategic situation. Bargainers still reach agreement in the first period and their bargaining shares increase in the strength of their own envy. As both bargainers' envy diminishes, the agreed partition converges to the Rubinstein division. If equally patient bargaining parties exhibit similar envy, then the agreed partition is tilted away from the Rubinstein division towards the equal division. Notably, the potential sensation of envy also boosts the share of the eventually envy-free party who leaves the bargaining with the larger share under the agreed partition. This gain in bargaining strength through envy can result in a bargaining outcome that is more unequal than predicted by the Rubinstein division.
“…They find a limited role of intrapersonal comparisons in the bargaining and evidence in support of "inequality aversion as an empirically relevant fairness criterion", concluding that interpersonal criteria seem to be "deeply ingrained in human behavior". Weg et al (1990) and Zwick et al (1992) assess the predictive accuracy of the Rubinstein solution with respect to variations in the discount factor and uncertainty about the bargaining horizon, respectively. Weg et al limit the number of trials until agreement to 20 rounds, resulting in a termination of 7 out of 324 bargaining games in their experiment.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As players are aware of this condition, an alternative approach introduced by Zwick et al (1992) implements the common discount factor as a fixed probability of exogenous breakdown rather than as cost of delay. Mean demands in Zwick et al's experiment were closer to the equal split than to the Rubinstein division.…”
Section: Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ample evidence suggests that at least some people show regard for others, which includes aspects of envy (e.g., Camerer 2003;Cooper & Kagel n.d.;De Bruyn & Bolton 2008;Kohler 2012c;Smith 2008;Zwick et al 1992). Neural Correlates of envy were shown in functional magnetic resonance imaging studies that associated stronger envy with stronger anterior cingulate cortex activation Takahashi et al (2009).…”
Bargainers in an open-ended alternating-offer bargaining situation may perceive envy, a utility loss caused by receiving the smaller share that is modeled in some social preferences in addition to self-interest. I extend Rubinstein (1982)'s original solution of the bargaining problem for two self-interested bargainers to this strategic situation. Bargainers still reach agreement in the first period and their bargaining shares increase in the strength of their own envy. As both bargainers' envy diminishes, the agreed partition converges to the Rubinstein division. If equally patient bargaining parties exhibit similar envy, then the agreed partition is tilted away from the Rubinstein division towards the equal division. Notably, the potential sensation of envy also boosts the share of the eventually envy-free party who leaves the bargaining with the larger share under the agreed partition. This gain in bargaining strength through envy can result in a bargaining outcome that is more unequal than predicted by the Rubinstein division.
“…Thus, since Murnighan and Roth () random termination has been the standard approach to manipulating the discount rate in laboratory experiment. Efforts to test their behavioral equivalence (Frechette and Yuksel, ; Zwick, Rapoport, and Howard, ) tend to find that games with discounting yield similar results to games with random termination.…”
“…To see this, consider a three-bargainers situation in which V 3 1 x 3 . Thus, in period 1, bargainer 3 is indifferent between accepting x 3 1 or rejecting it 6 Additional support for the restriction to these kinds of strategies comes (at least in the two-person case) from the experimental work of Zwick, Rapoport, and Howard (1992). and otherwise nothing, would be willing to do so for a less favorable outcome if more uncertainty existed.…”
Section: The Certainty Effect and Sspe Outcomesmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.