2018
DOI: 10.3389/fams.2018.00032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Periodic Models for the Earth-Moon System

Abstract: This paper discusses two alternative models to the Restricted Three Body Problem (RTBP) for the motion of a massless particle in the Earth-Moon system. These models are the Bicircular Problem (BCP) and the Quasi-Bicircular Problem (QBCP). While the RTBP is autonomous, the BCP and the QBCP are periodically time dependent due to the inclusion of the Sun's gravitational potential. Each of the two alternative models is suitable for certain regions of the phase space. More concretely, we show that the BCP is more a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the pulsatingrotating frame, it is trivially demonstrated that the ER3BP also admits an equilibrium L 2 point (to observe this, refer to Park and Howell (2024b)). Within the QBCP, the L 2 point evolves to a PO with three distinct lobes as determined within the pulsatingrotating frame and discussed in Andreu (1998); Jorba-Cuscó et al (2018); Rosales et al (2023). The HR4BP's L 2 counterpart also displays a periodic motion, but represented within the uniform-rotating frame as discussed in Olikara et al (2016); Henry et al (2023); Peterson et al (2023).…”
Section: Lagrange Pointmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Within the pulsatingrotating frame, it is trivially demonstrated that the ER3BP also admits an equilibrium L 2 point (to observe this, refer to Park and Howell (2024b)). Within the QBCP, the L 2 point evolves to a PO with three distinct lobes as determined within the pulsatingrotating frame and discussed in Andreu (1998); Jorba-Cuscó et al (2018); Rosales et al (2023). The HR4BP's L 2 counterpart also displays a periodic motion, but represented within the uniform-rotating frame as discussed in Olikara et al (2016); Henry et al (2023); Peterson et al (2023).…”
Section: Lagrange Pointmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Focusing on the BCP and QBCP, it is interesting to mention that despite modeling the same system, there are qualitatively differences between these two models around L 2 . (See Jorba-Cuscó et al [2018] for a discussion.) Thus, it is important to address the question of why we chose the BCP over the QBCP to study the dynamics around L 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the QBCP the L 2 is replaced by a periodic orbit that is small in the sense that its maximal distance to L 2 is of the order of 10 −6 , and it has the same stability type of the L 2 point. See Andreu [2002], Jorba-Cuscó et al [2018] and references therein for the details.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work done by Jorba-Cuscó et al [8,[72][73][74] for this problem, considers two more realistic dynamical models that take into account the gravitational effect of the Sun: the BCP and the QBCP models that include in both cases the SRP acceleration. In fact, including the Sun's gravity into the Earth-Moon-sail system does not increase the dynamical complexity of the model, since the SRP depends periodically on time with the same period as the Sun around the Earth-Moon system.…”
Section: State Of the Art 121 Solar Sailing And Hybrid Sail Propulsionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QBCP is a coherent version of the BCP. According to [31,112], the BCP is more adequate for the study of the dynamics near the triangular libration points, while the QBCP is more suitable for the study of the dynamics near the collinear libration points. In both models, the two libration points of the RTBP under consideration (the L 1 and L 2 points) are substituted by small periodic orbits, usually called their dynamical substitutes.…”
Section: Remarks and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%