2019
DOI: 10.1002/jeab.520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two open source designs for a low‐cost operant chamber using Raspberry Pi™

Abstract: After almost a century of use and development, operant chambers remain a significant financial investment for scientists. Small powerful single‐board computers such as the Raspberry Pi™ offer researchers a low‐cost alternative to expensive operant chambers. In this paper, we describe two new operant chambers, one using nose‐poke ports as operanda and another using a touchscreen. To validate the chamber designs, rats learned to perform both visual discrimination and delayed alternation tasks in each chamber. De… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Longley et al (2017) and Pasquali et al (2017) used infrared-motion detectors to monitor the activity levels of rats and arctic invertebrates respectively. 2018) built an advanced yet low-cost touchscreen operant chamber whereby an image is presented that, when touched by a rat, results in the release of food, a specific tone to be played and a LED light to be turned on, while food collection is detected using an IR sensor (see also Gurley, 2019).…”
Section: Electronic Sensing and Control To Study Animal Behaviour And Physiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Longley et al (2017) and Pasquali et al (2017) used infrared-motion detectors to monitor the activity levels of rats and arctic invertebrates respectively. 2018) built an advanced yet low-cost touchscreen operant chamber whereby an image is presented that, when touched by a rat, results in the release of food, a specific tone to be played and a LED light to be turned on, while food collection is detected using an IR sensor (see also Gurley, 2019).…”
Section: Electronic Sensing and Control To Study Animal Behaviour And Physiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the most advanced solutions are capable of performing tasks similar to those executed by high-end commercial systems. For example, O'Leary et al ( 2018) built an advanced yet low-cost touchscreen operant chamber whereby an image is presented that, when touched by a rat, results in the release of food, a specific tone to be played and a LED light to be turned on, while food collection is detected using an IR sensor (see also Gurley, 2019).…”
Section: Autonomous Learning Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bpod is a useful point of comparison as it is probably the most similar project to pyControl in terms of functionality and implementation, Bonsai because it represents a very different but powerful formalism for controlling experiments that is often complementary. Space constraints preclude detailed comparison with other projects, but see (Devarakonda et al, 2016;O'Leary et al, 2018;Kim et al, 2019;Gurley, 2019;Bhagat et al, 2020;Buscher et al, 2020). Despite these commonalities, there are significant differences which it is useful for prospective users to understand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the cost may be greater upfront, the touchscreen apparatus may be more economical in the long‐run as a single apparatus can be used in lieu of several different ones each with their own costs. Furthermore, as the popularity of touchscreen cognitive testing in rodents has increased, home‐made do‐it‐yourself touchscreen systems have been developed to try to offset some of the cost 27–31 . However, these home‐made systems still need to undergo the same optimization and rigorous validation the commercially available systems have undertaken 32 .…”
Section: The Limitations Of Rodent Touchscreen Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%