1994
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.68.12.8071-8081.1994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two open reading frames (ORF1 and ORF2) within the 2.0-kilobase latency-associated transcript of herpes simplex virus type 1 are not essential for reactivation from latency

Abstract: The herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) latency-associated transcripts (LATs) are dispensable for establishment and maintenance of latent infection. However, the LATs have been implicated in reactivation of the virus from its latent state. Since the reported LAT deletion and/or insertion variants that are reactivation impaired contain deletions in the putative LAT promoter, it is not known which LAT sequences are involved in reactivation. To examine the role of the 2.0-kb LAT in the process of reactivation and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(97 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the poly(A) insertion viruses preclude downstream transcripts from having a role in reactivation. These results also show that measurable levels of expression of transcripts including downstream translational reading frames, including the recently identified ORF-P (15,27,28,39), controlled by other promoters are not involved with reactivation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the poly(A) insertion viruses preclude downstream transcripts from having a role in reactivation. These results also show that measurable levels of expression of transcripts including downstream translational reading frames, including the recently identified ORF-P (15,27,28,39), controlled by other promoters are not involved with reactivation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Mutants of HSV-1 and -2 with deletions in the LAT promoter do not reactivate efficiently in several in vivo models (4,5,21,24,37,49), yet the biological mechanism for this apparent linkage between LAT expression and efficient reactivation is unknown. Characterization of several precisely defined mutants has eliminated reasonable mechanisms involving any role for the translation of the major translational reading frames contained within the major LAT introns (15,16); however, mechanisms involving the latent-phase expression of other peptides whose coding sequences are contained within the primary LAT transcript remain a possibility. Also formally consistent with available data in rabbits are other mechanisms requiring the presence of high levels of LAT introns and/or the transcription of the region of the HSV-1 genome encompassed by LAT, either to facilitate the expression of another transcript or to maintain a transcriptionally active viral template.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The translational frames which have been specifically mutagenized in this strain and shown to play no role in the efficient reactivation phenotypes in rabbits are shown as heavy bars in parentheses (17,74). Other translational frames in the 5Ј and other portions of LAT can be eliminated as playing a role based on data obtained by using inserted transcription termination/polyadenylation signals and by constructing deletions with other strains of virus (17,72,207). Finally, translation frames B, O, and P have been excluded from playing a major role in viral pathogenesis by specific mutagenesis (146).…”
Section: Detailed Characterization Of Latsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prominent open translational reading frame within the HSV-1 LAT intron prompted speculation and experimental study of the possibility that it or another protein expressed during the latent phase of infection could mediate the reactivation phenotype (300). The expression of this open reading frame during productive infection has been detected (160,224), but its elimination by mutation has no effect upon efficient spontaneous or induced reactivation in rabbits (16,74), nor does such mutation have an effect on explant-induced recovery of virus from latently infected mouse neurons (72).…”
Section: There Is No Evidence For a Latent Phase-expressed Viral Protmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thomas et al (84) demonstrated that deregulation of this major LAT ORF increased the growth potential of HSV-1 ICP0deficient mutant viruses. While these results all point to a protein encoded by LAT and its importance in virus regulation, Fareed and Spivack (27) showed that virus with defined mutations in the putative LAT ORFs did not differ from the parental wild-type virus in either the rate or frequency of reactivation. To further investigate the possibility of protein involvement in HSV-1 latency, Drolet et al (23) constructed recombinants between high-and low-frequency reactivation HSV-1 and found that the efficiency of reactivation was independent of the LAT ORF.…”
Section: Alphaherpesvirus Genes Transcribed During Latencymentioning
confidence: 88%