2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11406-015-9598-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Omnipotent Beings?

Abstract: The idea of omnipotence plays a crucial role within the framework of classical theism. God is typically considered omnipotent, that is, able to perform any action. Sometimes, it is said that for God there is no difference between will and action; everything he wishes happens. However, as one reflects on the concept of omnipotence, some rather complex questions arise; the range of God's possible Bactions^is not clear. What are the boundaries of the power of an omnipotent being, if these boundaries exist at all?… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, ‘[t]he question concerning the possibility of the existence of two omnipotent beings is crucially dependent on the adopted characterization of omnipotence’ (De Florio and Frigerio 2015: 310). Omnipotence is usually thought to be ‘the power to do anything logically possible’ (it is also sometimes defined as ‘a power exceeding that of any other possible being’, but this is clearly question-begging).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clearly, ‘[t]he question concerning the possibility of the existence of two omnipotent beings is crucially dependent on the adopted characterization of omnipotence’ (De Florio and Frigerio 2015: 310). Omnipotence is usually thought to be ‘the power to do anything logically possible’ (it is also sometimes defined as ‘a power exceeding that of any other possible being’, but this is clearly question-begging).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If being on the same page about a project is a metaphysical possibility, surely two omnibenevolent Gods can realize it, if anyone can. A ditheist-friendly source of inspiration would therefore be the happy marriage, where ‘what one wants is never contradicted by the other's will’ (De Florio and Frigerio 2015: 317). Since the most philosophically important decisions are made before arguments are ever crafted, focusing on the neglected attributes of omniscience and omnibenevolence might undermine monotheism's monopoly on the mainstream theological imagination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%