2006
DOI: 10.1109/tbc.2006.872992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Novel Nonlinear Companding Schemes With Iterative Receiver to Reduce PAPR in Multi-Carrier Modulation Systems

Abstract: Abstract-Companding transform is an efficient and simple method to reduce the Peak-to-Average Power Ratio (PAPR) for Multi-Carrier Modulation (MCM) systems. But if the MCM signal is only simply operated by inverse companding transform at the receiver, the resultant spectrum may exhibit severe in-band and out-of-band radiation of the distortion components, and considerable peak regrowth by excessive channel noises etc. In order to prevent these problems from occurring, in this paper, two novel nonlinear compand… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, schemes like phase optimization (Nikookar & Lidsheim, 2002), constellation shaping (Kou et al, 2007), selective mapping (SLM) (Lim et al, 2005), nonlinear companding transforms (Jiang et al, 2006), tone reservation (TR), tone injection (TI) (Mourelo., 1999;Yoo et al, 2006), partial transmit sequence (PTS) (Han & Lee, 2004;Müller & Huber, 1997;Cimini & Sollenberger, 2000;Tellambura, 2001), clipping and filtering (Wang & Tellambura, 2005;Li & Cimini, 1998;Nee & Wild, 1998), precoding based techniques (Slimane, 2007;Min & Jeoti, 2007;Baig & Jeoti, 2010a, 2010b, 2010c, precoding based selective mapping (PSLM) techniques (Baig & Jeoti, 2010a, 2010b and phase modulation transform (Tasi et al, 2006;Thompson et al, 2008) are popular. The precoding based techniques, however, show great promise as they are simple linear techniques to implement without the need of any side M T( ) .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, schemes like phase optimization (Nikookar & Lidsheim, 2002), constellation shaping (Kou et al, 2007), selective mapping (SLM) (Lim et al, 2005), nonlinear companding transforms (Jiang et al, 2006), tone reservation (TR), tone injection (TI) (Mourelo., 1999;Yoo et al, 2006), partial transmit sequence (PTS) (Han & Lee, 2004;Müller & Huber, 1997;Cimini & Sollenberger, 2000;Tellambura, 2001), clipping and filtering (Wang & Tellambura, 2005;Li & Cimini, 1998;Nee & Wild, 1998), precoding based techniques (Slimane, 2007;Min & Jeoti, 2007;Baig & Jeoti, 2010a, 2010b, 2010c, precoding based selective mapping (PSLM) techniques (Baig & Jeoti, 2010a, 2010b and phase modulation transform (Tasi et al, 2006;Thompson et al, 2008) are popular. The precoding based techniques, however, show great promise as they are simple linear techniques to implement without the need of any side M T( ) .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation among candidate signals deteriorates the PAPR reduction performance in PTS. The correlation among candidate signals is governed by two factors-one is the sub-block partition style as described in [6] and the other is the value of phase weighting factor set. So it is possible to alter these two factors to produce candidate signals with diminished correlation, so as to prevent degradation of the PAPR reduction performance.…”
Section: B the Partial Transmit Sequence(pts) Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the major defect regarding OFDM systems is the high peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR). Many PAPR reduction approaches have already been proposed such as clipping [2] and peak windowing, block coding [3], scrambling [4], nonlinear commanding transform schemes [5,6]. The most effective and efficient PAPR reduction method is the partial transmit sequence (PTS) approach in which the signal sub-blocks obtained by splitting the input data block are multiplied by phase weighting factors and then summed up to produce an alternative transmit without any loss of information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the major problems is its sensitivity to peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) of transmitted signals, and some schemes have been proposed to reduce the PAPR in OFDM systems [3,4]. High PAPR results in a way that an OFDM receiver's detection efficiency becomes very sensitive to nonlinear devices used in a signal processing loop, such as digitalto-analog converter (DAC) and high-power amplifier, which may severely impair performance due to induced spectral regrowth and detection efficiency degradation [5,6]. Therefore, it is very important to accurately identify PAPR distribution in OFDM systems to work out some effective measures to curb PAPR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the PAPR of OFDM signals, numerous techniques have been proposed in the literature [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. A comprehensive tutorial review of PAPR reduction techniques in OFDM systems is summarized in [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%