“…Another difficulty in identifying cryptic species is the fact that the taxonomy is being continuously updated with new modifications due to the new criteria for fungal nomenclature, 69 synonymisations 50,70 and new species being constantly described in the current literature. 6,8,12,16,[27][28][29]50,55,57,60,62 For example, among the species reported in the isolates of this study, three of them (A. europaeus, A. micronesiensis and A. spelaeus) were not even described at the moment of their isolation from clinical samples. Currently, a polyphasic approach that combines multilocus phylogenetic analyses using sequences of extype strains and the phenotypic characteristics of the isolates is the recommended methodology to reach reliable species identification in Aspergillus.…”