2022
DOI: 10.1002/arch.21901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two new stick insect species of Sosibia Stål (Phasmatodea: Lonchodidae: Necrosciinae) from China and the first report on mitochondrial genomes of this genus

Abstract: We describe and illustrate two new species of Sosibia from China: Sosibia gibba sp. nov. and Sosibia ovata sp. nov. This report includes a key to Sosibia species from China and a description of the distribution area in China. The two mitochondrial genomes of these new Sosibia species were sequenced and annotated for the first time. The compositional biases, codon usage, nucleotide composition, and construct tRNA secondary structures of the two mitogenomes were analyzed. The phylogenetic relationships based on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large-scale phylogenetic analysis of Phasmatodea has used both mitochondrial and nuclear genes [ 5 , 36 , 42 ]; however, phylogenetic analysis of mitogenomes has involved a limited number of species, suggesting the need for further sequencing of mitogenomes in this taxon. [ 34 , 45 , 98 ]. The phylogenetic status of Timematidae and Aschiphasmatidae tended to be stable, whether based on mitogenomes [ 32 , 33 , 34 ] or molecular markers [ 36 , 41 , 51 , 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large-scale phylogenetic analysis of Phasmatodea has used both mitochondrial and nuclear genes [ 5 , 36 , 42 ]; however, phylogenetic analysis of mitogenomes has involved a limited number of species, suggesting the need for further sequencing of mitogenomes in this taxon. [ 34 , 45 , 98 ]. The phylogenetic status of Timematidae and Aschiphasmatidae tended to be stable, whether based on mitogenomes [ 32 , 33 , 34 ] or molecular markers [ 36 , 41 , 51 , 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%