“…However, DNA data from all these have not been shared in GenBank or other online databases (Avila et al 2010, 2012, 2015, Escobar-Huerta et al 2015, Esquerré et al 2014, Martínez et al 2011) which does not allow the replication of the provided phylogenies or genetic distances. Two described species (Quinteros 2012, Troncoso-Palacios et al 2015a), Liolaemus
abdalai and Liolaemus
zabalai , are supported in regards to DNA features by previously published phylogenetic works. Nine species ( Liolaemus
aparicioi , Liolaemus
carlosgarini , Liolaemus
choique , Liolaemus
chungara , Liolaemus
nigrocoeruleus , Liolaemus
pyriphlogos , Liolaemus
riodamas , Liolaemus
scorialis and Liolaemus
smaug ) have been described without the support of molecular data (Abdala et al 2010, Esquerré et al 2013, Marambio-Alfaro and Troncoso-Palacios 2014, Ocampo et al 2012, Quinteros 2012, Quinteros et al 2014, Troncoso-Palacios et al 2015a).…”