2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1500-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two new regions of interest to evaluate separately cortical and trabecular BMD in the proximal femur using DXA

Abstract: To differentiate changes in trabecular and cortical bone density at a skeletal site bearing body weight, the main goal of this retrospective study was to develop and characterize two new regions of interest (ROIs) for DXA at the hip, one mainly focusing on trabecular bone and another mainly focusing on cortical bone. Specific aims were to maximize the precision of the ROIs and to characterize their usefulness for monitoring age-related bone loss and discriminating controls from fracture cases in a cross-sectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 The DEXA evaluation at this site appears to have less reproducibility than at other sites in the hip. 25 There is a higher percentage of trabecular bone in this region (compared with other regions within the hip), which may account for this phenomenon. As such, any observed changes in BMD at Ward's Triangle might not reflect true changes in cortical bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…24 The DEXA evaluation at this site appears to have less reproducibility than at other sites in the hip. 25 There is a higher percentage of trabecular bone in this region (compared with other regions within the hip), which may account for this phenomenon. As such, any observed changes in BMD at Ward's Triangle might not reflect true changes in cortical bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Recently, the International Society of Clinical Densitometry recommended that BMD at this sight not be used to diagnose osteoporosis 24 . The DEXA evaluation at this site appears to have less reproducibility than at other sites in the hip 25 . There is a higher percentage of trabecular bone in this region (compared with other regions within the hip), which may account for this phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such a precise registration scheme is impossible in the clinical setting. However, improvements in post-image processing, advancements in macro-and microstructure imaging (Rubin et al, 1992), and novel and comprehensive DXA ROI’s (Takada et al, 1997; Prevrhal et al, 2004) will aid in registration and analysis. While data on limb dominance, recent and accumulated activity level prior to death, and past medical history may have affected the loading pattern of the femur would have been interesting covariates, this data was not available to us.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of the potential effectiveness of antiresorptive therapy, vitamin D and calcium supplementation, either separately or in combination, for ameliorating any adverse longitudinal effects of AEDs on bone would be worthwhile. Also, use of newer scanning technology to allow micro-architectural indices to be measured, focusing separately on trabecular and cortical bone parameters [37] may better quantify bone strength and predict fracture risk in AED users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%