2023
DOI: 10.1017/rdc.2023.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two New Millennium-Long Tree-Ring Oxygen Isotope Chronologies (2349–1009 Bce and 1412–466 Bce) From Japan

Abstract: We present two new millennium-long tree-ring oxygen isotope chronologies for central and northern Japan, based on 9693 annually resolved measurements of tree-ring oxygen isotopes from 39 unearthed samples consisting mainly of Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica). These chronologies were developed through cross-dating of tree-ring widths and δ18O data from multiple samples covering the periods 2349–1009 BCE (1341 yr) and 1412–466 BCE (947 yr) for central and northern Japan, respectively. In combination with ou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean standard deviation of multiple measurements for the same segment of the same tree ring was ± 0.38‰ (n = 816). This is larger than the typical analytical uncertainties for annual tree-ring samples of ± 0.2‰ (Sano et al, 2023;Zhao et al, 2023) because the value of 100 standard deviation for this study includes the influence of variability in δ 18 O within tree-ring in addition to the error in isotope measurement. However, this value is sufficiently smaller than the typical range of intra-ring δ 18 O variation of 4-6‰ (Fig.…”
Section: Study Site 65mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The mean standard deviation of multiple measurements for the same segment of the same tree ring was ± 0.38‰ (n = 816). This is larger than the typical analytical uncertainties for annual tree-ring samples of ± 0.2‰ (Sano et al, 2023;Zhao et al, 2023) because the value of 100 standard deviation for this study includes the influence of variability in δ 18 O within tree-ring in addition to the error in isotope measurement. However, this value is sufficiently smaller than the typical range of intra-ring δ 18 O variation of 4-6‰ (Fig.…”
Section: Study Site 65mentioning
confidence: 79%