2018
DOI: 10.3906/bot-1712-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two new Malagasy species of genus Piper L. (Piperaceae), Piper malgassicum and Piper tsarasotrae , and their phylogenetic position

Abstract: Introduction Most recently, treatments of the pantropical genus Piper L. (Piperaceae) included more than 2000 species (Quijano-Abril et al., 2006). The phylogenetic position of Piper L. and of family Piperaceae was inserted within the complex basal group of dicots termed "paleoherbs" (Loconte and Stevenson, 1991). More recently, APG IV (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group et al., 2016) inserted Piperaceae in order Piperales, nested within Magnoliids. The distribution of Piper is pantropical and the genus develops highl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(41 reference statements)
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The plants were collected by E. Palchetti and N. Gandolfi in two different areas of the Ambositra region in Madagascar: the first group belonging to the P. malgassicum type was collected into the tropical rainy forest of Vohiday and the second group, belonging to the P. tsarasotrae type in the semi-dry area of Tsaratsotra village. These plants were compared with the samples of P. tsarasotrae and P. malgassicum which have been used for the previous research [13]. Samples were conserved either in ethanol 96% either as herbarium sample by the ET (Tropical Herbarium of Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 4 September 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202009.0083.v1 Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 4 September 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202009.0083.v1…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The plants were collected by E. Palchetti and N. Gandolfi in two different areas of the Ambositra region in Madagascar: the first group belonging to the P. malgassicum type was collected into the tropical rainy forest of Vohiday and the second group, belonging to the P. tsarasotrae type in the semi-dry area of Tsaratsotra village. These plants were compared with the samples of P. tsarasotrae and P. malgassicum which have been used for the previous research [13]. Samples were conserved either in ethanol 96% either as herbarium sample by the ET (Tropical Herbarium of Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 4 September 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202009.0083.v1 Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 4 September 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202009.0083.v1…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its presence in Madagascar was affirmed by De Candolle [11] [12]. The fact that P. borbonense is cultivated makes more complex to understand its real distribution areal [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The genus Piper L. belongs to the family Piperaceae and includes more than 2000 species with a pantropical distribution (Quijano-Abril et al 2006), most of them from America (Ulloa Ulloa et al 2017). Nowadays, the phylogenetic position of Piper as well as of the Piperaceae family, is among the so-called "paleoherbs", a phylogenetically complex basal group of dicots (Loconte and Stevenson 1991;Chase et al 2016), within the order Piperales (Jaramillo et al 2008;Palchetti et al 2018). Piperales are herbaceous or woody plants exhibiting quite primitive morpho-anatomical features (Isnard et al 2012) Piper species can be described either as shrubs, or more frequently, as creepers and lianas in the equatorial regions (Jaramillo et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the explicit and satisfactory differentiation in the ICN , we argue that the distinction of a diagnosis and a description is not clear to many taxonomists these days, especially the younger ones. New taxa, especially new species, are often described supported only by descriptions, without a diagnosis (e.g., Berry & Galdames, ; Van der Maesen, ; Palchetti & al., ; Shui & al., ; Vaezi & al., ; Vladimirov & al., ), or other times diagnostic and descriptive information is joined under one or the other (e.g., Kuijt & Delprete, ). In some cases, a diagnosis is presented after a description (e.g., Arigela & al., ; Guzmán‐Guzmán, ; Xiao & al., ), which we consider that further adds to the current state of confusion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%