1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1988.tb05471.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two new indices for stomach content analysis of fishes

Abstract: Two indices, Simple Resultant Index (R,) and Weighted Resultant Index ( R J , are proposed for enabling the analysis of stomach contents of fishes. The indices are based on percentage occurrence and percentage volume, as in the case of the Index of Preponderance. Possible graphical representation of the indices helps towards understanding the relative representation of the two contributing parameters. The weighted index is, in particular, a means of comparison, grading food items in the order of importance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Prey volume less than 5 mm 3 was estimated employing the geometric formula method. The volumetric percentage (%V), frequency of occurrence (%FO), and frequency of occurrence adjusted to 100% (%FOAJ), were calculated for each of the identified categories, according to HYSLOP (1980) and MOHAN & SANKARAN (1988). A prey was considered important, and utilized for description of the diet and foraging strategy, when presenting at least one of the indexes (%V or %FOAJ) greater than or equal to 100/S, where S is the number of prey per size class of the individuals utilized in the analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prey volume less than 5 mm 3 was estimated employing the geometric formula method. The volumetric percentage (%V), frequency of occurrence (%FO), and frequency of occurrence adjusted to 100% (%FOAJ), were calculated for each of the identified categories, according to HYSLOP (1980) and MOHAN & SANKARAN (1988). A prey was considered important, and utilized for description of the diet and foraging strategy, when presenting at least one of the indexes (%V or %FOAJ) greater than or equal to 100/S, where S is the number of prey per size class of the individuals utilized in the analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A graphical representation of Rw index helped to elucidate the relative contribution of the occurrence or volume of every food item present in the stomach contents. The index values allow comparisons among the items following their order of importance (Mohan & Sankaran, 1988). When the value of Φ ranged from 0 to 45, the food item comprised much of the volume of the sample; in contrast, when the value of Φ ranged from 45 to 90, the food item occurred more frequently in the sample.…”
Section: φ 45| 45mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dietary patterns of T. borellianus were analysed using the Weighted Result Index (Rw) (Mohan & Sankaran, 1988), applying the following formula:…”
Section: Crab Collection and Gut Content Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequency of Occurrence (%FO) and wet weight percentage (%W) were combined to calculate the Preponderance Index (%IP) (Mohan & Sankaran, 1988). Additionally, diet data were grouped into two seasonal groups: summer-autumn (January to June), and winter-spring (July to December) (Paredes, 2015), toward establishing the order of numerical dominance of items within the diet, according to the following:…”
Section: Diet Studymentioning
confidence: 99%