2021
DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.514.3.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two new combinations in the genus Panus (Panaceae, Polyporales) based on morphology and molecular phylogeny

Abstract: Panus is a genus of the order Polyporales with a gilled hymenium. Although Panus was earlier considered as a sub genus of the genus Lentinus, molecular phylogenetic studies support the independent status of the genus. As a result, many species were transferred from Lentinus to Panus. Many more species of Lentinus that are more related to Panus, still await critical taxonomic studies and formal transfers. Morphological and molecular data obtained from L. bambusinus and L. roseus reveal that these are Panus spec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, a phylogenetic tree generated from the ML analysis is shown in Figure 1 . The phylogenetic tree was consistent with the results of previous phylogenetic studies [ 24 , 25 ]. Phylogenetic analyses assigned the genera Cymatoderma and Panus in the family Panaceae.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As a result, a phylogenetic tree generated from the ML analysis is shown in Figure 1 . The phylogenetic tree was consistent with the results of previous phylogenetic studies [ 24 , 25 ]. Phylogenetic analyses assigned the genera Cymatoderma and Panus in the family Panaceae.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Notably, the presence of the smaller basidiospores in P. sribuabanensis clearly distinguishes it from P. caespiticola (5.0–7.5 × 4.0–5.5 μm) [ 19 , 50 ]. Additionally, the narrower size of the basidiospores (4.0–6.0 × 3.0–4.0 μm, Q m = 1.42) in P. sribuabanensis clearly distinguishes it from P. bambusinus (5.0–6.5 × 4.0–4.5 μm, Q m = 1.32) [ 25 , 51 ]. Moreover, the wider size of cheilocystidia (21.0–70.0 × 5.0–9.0 μm) in P. sribuabanensis clearly differs from P. bambusinus (22.0–68.0 × 3.0–5.0 μm) [ 25 , 51 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations