Replication forks formed at bacterial origins often encounter template roadblocks in the form of DNA adducts and frozen protein-DNA complexes, leading to replication-fork stalling and inactivation. Subsequent correction of the corrupting template lesion and origin-independent assembly of a new replisome therefore are required for survival of the bacterium. A number of models for replication-fork restart under these conditions posit that nascent strand regression at the stalled fork generates a Holliday junction that is a substrate for subsequent processing by recombination and repair enzymes. We show here that early replication intermediates containing replication forks stalled in vitro by the accumulation of excess positive supercoils could be cleaved by the Holliday junction resolvases RusA and RuvC. Cleavage by RusA was inhibited by the presence of RuvA and was stimulated by RecG, confirming the presence of Holliday junctions in the replication intermediate and supporting the previous proposal that RecG could catalyze nascent strand regression at stalled replication forks. Furthermore, RecG promoted Holliday junction formation when replication intermediates in which the replisome had been inactivated were negatively supercoiled, suggesting that under intracellular conditions, the action of RecG, or helicases with similar activities, is necessary for the catalysis of nascent strand regression. T he picture of how DNA replication proceeds around the bacterial chromosome has changed over the last decade as a result of research in many laboratories (1). Even though the two replication forks that form at oriC have a sufficiently high enough inherent processivity to complete replication of the chromosome, it is clear that this is generally not what happens. Instead, the replication forks formed at the origin become inactivated at high frequency as a result of an encounter with roadblocks either in or on the template strands. These roadblocks can take many forms: a nick in one of the template strands, a DNA adduct formed as a result of endogenous damage, secondary structure in the template, and frozen proteins on the DNA. Survival then depends on both correction of the damage and reactivation of DNA replication.Although there is a large body of both genetic and biochemical data informing the mechanisms that act to repair damaged nucleotides in DNA, except in one instance, the mechanisms of replication-fork restart are less well defined. Replication-fork restart after an encounter with a template nick, leading to double-strand break (DSB) generation and detachment from the growing fork of one of the nascent sister duplexes-sometimes termed replication fork collapse (2)-is effected by a marriage of homologous recombination and DNA replication proteins (3). Here, the DSB generated is processed by RecBCD to generate a recombinogenic 3Ј single-stranded tail that is used for RecAcatalyzed strand invasion with the intact sister duplex, creating a D loop. This structure is recognized by PriA (4, 5), which then directs the a...