2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01357-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two models of impulsivity: relationship to personality traits and psychopathology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

21
228
1
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(258 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
21
228
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…It is consistent with other work showing that ATD affects impulsive behavior only in certain individuals (Cherek and Lane, 1999;LeMarquand et al, 1999;Bjork et al, 2000;Marsh et al, 2002;Swann et al, 2002; but see Crean et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It is consistent with other work showing that ATD affects impulsive behavior only in certain individuals (Cherek and Lane, 1999;LeMarquand et al, 1999;Bjork et al, 2000;Marsh et al, 2002;Swann et al, 2002; but see Crean et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In support of this suggestion, little correlation has been found between different measures of impulsivity in normal human volunteers (McDonald et al, 2003), and although clinical studies often use the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) as an overall measure of 'trait impulsivity', factor analysis reveals that the items within this scale cluster into three independent factors (Patton et al, 1995). In a recent study using human volunteers, errors of commission on a continuous performance test (a potential measure of impulsive action analogous to the 5CSRT and 'one-choice' tasks) were strongly correlated with BIS scores, whereas performance on a delay-discounting task showed only a moderate correlation with this questionnaire measure (Swann et al, 2002). It has also been suggested that two sub-types of ADHD exist which have different neurobiological bases, and which are predominantly categorized by different measures of impulsivity; poor inhibitory control is associated with disordered thought and action regulated by mesocortical dopamine systems, and intolerance to delay of gratification reflects an altered motivational style linked to mesolimbic dopamine systems (Sonuga-Barke, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the broad use of the term impulsivity, it is not surprising that a wide range of definitions and measures have been developed for the construct of impulsivity, with researchers differentiating between two (Dickman, 1990;Swann, Bjork, Moeller, & Dougherty, 2002) or three (Dougherty, Marsh, Mathias, & Swann, 2005) subtypes of impulsivity. For example, according to Dougherty et al (2005), impulsivity can be divided into at least three main categories, including (a) response initiation, (b) response inhibition, and (c) consequence sensitivity or reward delay.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%