2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2006.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two models for evaluating landslide hazards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of landslide susceptibility mapping, the aim of logistic regression is to find the best-fitting model to describe the relationship of the presence or absence of landslides (dependent variable) with a set of independent parameters such as slope angle, aspect, curvature, lithology and land use (Dai et al 2001, Ohlmacher and Davis 2003, Davis et al 2006, Lee and Pradhan 2007, Nefeslioglu et al 2008, Pradhan et al 2008, Yilmaz 2009). Quantitatively, the relationship between the probability of land sliding and the independent variables can be expressed as:…”
Section: Landslide Susceptibility Modelling Using Logistic Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of landslide susceptibility mapping, the aim of logistic regression is to find the best-fitting model to describe the relationship of the presence or absence of landslides (dependent variable) with a set of independent parameters such as slope angle, aspect, curvature, lithology and land use (Dai et al 2001, Ohlmacher and Davis 2003, Davis et al 2006, Lee and Pradhan 2007, Nefeslioglu et al 2008, Pradhan et al 2008, Yilmaz 2009). Quantitatively, the relationship between the probability of land sliding and the independent variables can be expressed as:…”
Section: Landslide Susceptibility Modelling Using Logistic Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative methods are based on numerical statements of the correlation between causative factors and landslides. Deterministic models (Gokceoglu and Aksoy 1996) (Baeza andCorominas 2001, Carrara et al 2003), artificial neural network (Gomez and Kavzoglu 2005, Nefeslioglu et al 2008, Pradhan and Lee 2009a,b, Yilmaz 2009), fuzzy logic (Ercanoglu and Gokceoglu 2004, Kanungo et al 2006, Pradhan et al 2009, and logistic regression that is the most common statistical method used in earth sciences (Jade and Sarkar 1993, Wieczorek et al 1996, Guzzetti et al 1999, Dai et al 2001, Dai and Lee 2002, Ohlmacher and Davis 2003, Chau et al 2004a, Can et al 2005, Chao and Chan 2005, Davis et al 2006, Duman et al 2006, Greco et al 2007, Lee and Pradhan 2007, Nefeslioglu et al 2008, Pradhan et al 2008, Yilmaz 2009 (Kelarestaghi and Jafarian 2010), which makes hill slopes susceptible to landslide occurrence (Kelarestaghi and Garaee 2007), it is extremely necessary to model and map landslide spatial distribution using new quantitative approaches. The present study is carried out by identifying some main physical factors contributing to the landslide occurrence and incorporating them in logistic multiple regression, by which regional slope instability in the Sajarood basin, Northern Iran, was modelled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess landslide susceptibility on a regional scale, multivariate statistical approaches were commonly used in the last decades. Especially discriminant analysis (Carrara et al, 1991(Carrara et al, , 2003Davis et al, 2006;Santacana et al, 2003), logistic regression Dai and Lee, 2002;Ohlmacher and Davis, 2003;Tasser et al, 2003;Van Den Eeckhaut et al, 2006;Yesilnacar and Topal, 2005) and neural networks (Ermini et al, 2005;Yesilnacar and Topal, 2005;Kanungo et al, 2006;Gomez and Kavzoglu, 2005) have successfully been applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such cal cu la tion, for time-based par ti tion ing of past landslides, used to be per formed for long-term sce nar ios (e.g., Chung and Fabbri, 2003;Da vis et al, 2006;Dewitte et al, 2006) with an as sump tion that let say for 20-40 year pe riod caus ative fac tors and land slide oc cur rences (af fected ar eas) rep re sent av er age con di tions.…”
Section: Fig 4 Density Distribution Of Landslide and Non-landslide mentioning
confidence: 99%