1916
DOI: 10.1037/h0072492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two methods of subjective learning in the monkey Macacus Rhesus.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1917
1917
1963
1963

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a man refines himself and his instruments, he feels a decided progression in general efficiency and integration of thought. This tendency to perfection through practice, in manipulating the self as well as the environment, is also to be seen in animals (36 In such cases, the personality regresses to a heedless, self-indulgent, indolent, childhood level, where, with its enormous reserve of physical power, it easily gratifies its slothful, childish requirements with relatively careless incoordinated forms of thought. Affective regression essentially produces a disintegration of the higher integrations of function or thought, whereas affective progression requires the construction of more comprehensive and refined integrations of thought.…”
Section: Il6 Autonomic Functions and The Personality Affective Progrementioning
confidence: 96%
“…As a man refines himself and his instruments, he feels a decided progression in general efficiency and integration of thought. This tendency to perfection through practice, in manipulating the self as well as the environment, is also to be seen in animals (36 In such cases, the personality regresses to a heedless, self-indulgent, indolent, childhood level, where, with its enormous reserve of physical power, it easily gratifies its slothful, childish requirements with relatively careless incoordinated forms of thought. Affective regression essentially produces a disintegration of the higher integrations of function or thought, whereas affective progression requires the construction of more comprehensive and refined integrations of thought.…”
Section: Il6 Autonomic Functions and The Personality Affective Progrementioning
confidence: 96%
“…'stimulus enhancement' (Spence, 1937). Kempf's (1916) experiments, using six Rhesus monkeys, are also inconclusive, for, using method (l), it cannot be clearly established that anything more than the place relevant to solution was what the 0 learned, by watching the successful D, to discriminate. Indeed, Kempf says as much in concluding: 'Imitation seems possible only when similar movements under similar circumstances have already been previously acquired by the organism.…”
Section: The Evidence On Monkeys and Apesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of similar tests on an orang and chimpanzee were entirely negative (105, 107). Kempf's rhesus monkeys showed surprisingly little aptitude for imitating such a simple act as reaching through a small aperture in the cage wall to obtain food from a box (57). Similarly there are a number of incidental observations indicating the difficulty of eliciting imitative behavior in monkey (15,76,79,146), orang (149) and gorilla (151,152).…”
Section: Secondary Problem Solutions: Trial and Error Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%