The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1515/msr-2017-0031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Methods of Automatic Evaluation of Speech Signal Enhancement Recorded in the Open-Air MRI Environment

Abstract: The paper focuses on two methods of evaluation of successfulness of speech signal enhancement recorded in the open-air magnetic resonance imager during phonation for the 3D human vocal tract modeling. The first approach enables to obtain a comparison based on statistical analysis by ANOVA and hypothesis tests. The second method is based on classification by Gaussian mixture models (GMM). The performed experiments have confirmed that the proposed ANOVA and GMM classifiers for automatic evaluation of the speech … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the cluster number is given, the data PDF in the 2D space will be estimated using any sophisticated machine learning estimator in Step (2). In this case, the Gaussian mixture model (GMM) [55][56][57] was adopted for the following algorithmic estimations. Then, the corresponding KEDF and PEDF can be estimated using Equations (3) and (4), respectively, in Step (3).…”
Section: Experimental Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the cluster number is given, the data PDF in the 2D space will be estimated using any sophisticated machine learning estimator in Step (2). In this case, the Gaussian mixture model (GMM) [55][56][57] was adopted for the following algorithmic estimations. Then, the corresponding KEDF and PEDF can be estimated using Equations (3) and (4), respectively, in Step (3).…”
Section: Experimental Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic identification and segmentation of medical imageries benefit the planning and guidance of modern surgery [1][2][3][4][5], clinical investigations [6][7][8][9][10], rehabilitation [11][12][13], and so forth. High-quality reconstructive anatomical morphology provides convenience on surgery planning and the understanding between organ functionalities and pathological diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%