2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.05.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two metaheuristic methods for the common cycle economic lot sizing and scheduling in flexible flow shops with limited intermediate buffers: The finite horizon case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They proposed three bi-objective metaheuristic algorithms based on the simulated annealing algorithm. Akrami, Karimi and Moattar Hosseini [12] proposed GA and Tabu search (TS) for joint economic lot sizing and scheduling problems in the FFS environment with respect to limited intermediate buffers.…”
Section: Literature Reviews 21 Metaheuristic Algorithms For Flexiblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They proposed three bi-objective metaheuristic algorithms based on the simulated annealing algorithm. Akrami, Karimi and Moattar Hosseini [12] proposed GA and Tabu search (TS) for joint economic lot sizing and scheduling problems in the FFS environment with respect to limited intermediate buffers.…”
Section: Literature Reviews 21 Metaheuristic Algorithms For Flexiblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para la generación de la población inicial [8,15,[24][25]27] utilizan una generación aleatoria, sin incluir algún conocimiento previo del conjunto de cromosomas [28]. Mientras en [14,16,[29][30] utilizan heurísticas para la generación de la población inicial, introduciendo un conocimiento previo de un conjunto probable de buenas soluciones (cromosomas), el cual proporciona una forma de aceleración en la obtención de una buena solución. En este trabajo se utiliza la generación de la población inicial como vecindades de las soluciones generadas por las heurísticas EDD y Slack debido al buen desempeño observado respecto del algoritmo genético básico estudiado en [15].…”
Section: Algoritmo Genéticounclassified
“…In order to distinguish it from the pure FFS problem that can be solved by MILP, recent researches have designed different manufacturing environments with specific characters that may need unique solutions, for example, FFS problem with sequencedependent setup times [6,7], with common cycle multiproduct lot sizing [8], with a bottleneck stage [9], or with processor blocking [10]. But no matter how characteristic these research environments may be, there is one thing in common: that is, they all make the scheduling plan in a static way.…”
Section: Static Scheduling and Dynamic Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%