2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.08.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Mechanisms Produce Mutation Hotspots at DNA Breaks in Escherichia coli

Abstract: SummaryMutation hotspots and showers occur across phylogeny and profoundly influence genome evolution, yet the mechanisms that produce hotspots remain obscure. We report that DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) provoke mutation hotspots via stress-induced mutation in Escherichia coli. With tet reporters placed 2 kb to 2 Mb (half the genome) away from an I-SceI site, RpoS/DinB-dependent mutations occur maximally within the first 2 kb and decrease logarithmically to ∼60 kb. A weak mutation tail extends to 1 Mb. Hots… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4) is readily attributed to DNA polymerase activity, further supporting the replication-dependent FoSTeS/MMBIR model, rather than replication-independent end-joining models, as a comprehensive interpretation of the rearrangement mechanism in the Blm-deficient situation. FoSTeS/MMBIR is thought to involve the repair mechanism of one-ended DSBs arising from collapsed replication forks (Liu et al 2012), whereas, in the present experimental study, the rearrangement mechanism should involve two-ended DSBs generated by I-SceI cleavage, which has not been implicated in previously proposed break-induced replication (BIR) models, with the exception of one-ended DSBs induced by I-SceI cleavage of prokaryotic circular genomes (Shee et al 2012). So far, the limited scale of the current experiment has hampered the complete tracing of the two DNA ends generated by a single I-SceI cleavage and has resulted in fate tracing of either end of the break (Fig.…”
Section: Possible Molecular Mechanisms For Genomic Rearrangements Indmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…4) is readily attributed to DNA polymerase activity, further supporting the replication-dependent FoSTeS/MMBIR model, rather than replication-independent end-joining models, as a comprehensive interpretation of the rearrangement mechanism in the Blm-deficient situation. FoSTeS/MMBIR is thought to involve the repair mechanism of one-ended DSBs arising from collapsed replication forks (Liu et al 2012), whereas, in the present experimental study, the rearrangement mechanism should involve two-ended DSBs generated by I-SceI cleavage, which has not been implicated in previously proposed break-induced replication (BIR) models, with the exception of one-ended DSBs induced by I-SceI cleavage of prokaryotic circular genomes (Shee et al 2012). So far, the limited scale of the current experiment has hampered the complete tracing of the two DNA ends generated by a single I-SceI cleavage and has resulted in fate tracing of either end of the break (Fig.…”
Section: Possible Molecular Mechanisms For Genomic Rearrangements Indmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Reciprocally, for the same value of b, species with larger a have relatively greater selective forces against larger deviations from neutral alleles, lowering possibilities for drift and adaptation. Since the mutation rate is subject to molecular and selection factors (Shee et al 2012), one may speculate whether similar factors might modulate a and b, and underlie shifts between evolutionary quiescence and bursts.…”
Section: Org Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, thymine limitation/starvation was shown to be mutagenic in thymineless bacteria (50). Another example of stress-induced mutagenesis is adaptive mutagenesis (51) mediated by starvation for a carbon source, a form of DNA break-induced mutagenesis (52,53). In the present case, a number of factors conspired to create a potentially mutagenic condition.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Second, the induction of the SOS response (14,17) and the associated induction of error-prone DNA polymerases are expected to contribute to decreased replication fidelity. Third, the observed replication stress is accompanied by DNA breaks, as evidenced by the strong requirement for RecA function for promoting survival (14), and these breaks may promote mutagenesis as well, producing both point mutations and deletion/duplications (52,54).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%