2013
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.88.042502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-loop QED corrections with closed fermion loops for the bound-electrongfactor

Abstract: Two-loop QED corrections with closed fermion loops are calculated for the 1s bound-electron g factor. Calculations are performed to all orders in the nuclear binding strength parameter Zα (where Z is the nuclear charge and α is the fine-structure constant) except for the closed fermion loop, which is treated within the free-loop (Uehling) approximation in some cases. Comparison with previous Zα-expansion calculations is made and the higher-order remainder of order α 2 (Zα) 5 and higher is separated out from th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(79 reference statements)
3
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…At high nuclear charges, where Zα ≈ 1, an expansion in Zα is not applicable. So far, the two-loop diagrams with two electric vacuum polarization (VP) loops and those with one electric VP and one self-energy (SE) loop were evaluated nonperturbatively in Zα [20].For a broad range of Z, the two-loop SE corrections, which are by far the hardest to calculate, constitute the largest source of uncertainty. This holds true even at Z = 6, after a recent high-precision evaluation of the one-loop SE corrections [4,18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At high nuclear charges, where Zα ≈ 1, an expansion in Zα is not applicable. So far, the two-loop diagrams with two electric vacuum polarization (VP) loops and those with one electric VP and one self-energy (SE) loop were evaluated nonperturbatively in Zα [20].For a broad range of Z, the two-loop SE corrections, which are by far the hardest to calculate, constitute the largest source of uncertainty. This holds true even at Z = 6, after a recent high-precision evaluation of the one-loop SE corrections [4,18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At high nuclear charges, where Zα ≈ 1, an expansion in Zα is not applicable. So far, the two-loop diagrams with two electric vacuum polarization (VP) loops and those with one electric VP and one self-energy (SE) loop were evaluated nonperturbatively in Zα [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fit performed in [15,16] resulted in b 50 (fit) = −4.0(5.1). Here we directly determine contributions to b 50 beyond the already known vacuum-polarization effects b VP 50 [25,28]. We write b 50 = b VP 50 + ∆b 50 and set out to compute…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagrams with the external magnetic field coupling to the virtual electron loop are expected to be small [25]. In this class, we consider only the so-called magnetic loop contributions [37], examples of which are shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results could be further improved by combining theoretical and experimental values for two different H-like ions (Sturm et al, 2014). This idea of combining precise g-factor measurements and QED calculations (Czarnecki and Szafron, 2016;Sturm et al, 2013a;Yerokhin and Harman, 2013), has recently yielded a 13-fold improvement on the electron mass determination (Köhler et al, 2015;Sturm et al, 2014;Zatorski et al, 2017).…”
Section: Microwave Studies Of the Bound-electron G Factormentioning
confidence: 99%