2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-loop QED Bhabha scattering differential cross section

Abstract: We calculate the two-loop virtual, UV renormalized corrections at order α 4 (N F = 1) in QED to the Bhabha scattering differential cross section, for arbitrary values of the squared c.m. energy s and momentum transfer t, and on-shell electrons and positrons of finite mass m. The calculation is carried out within the dimensional regularization scheme; the remaining IR divergences appear as polar singularities in (D − 4). The result is presented in terms of 1-and 2-dimensional harmonic polylogarithms, of maximum… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
78
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By employing the results of [8,9], it was possible to complete the calculation of the virtual Bhabha scattering unpolarized differential cross-section, including the contribution of two-loop graphs involving a closed fermion loop (conventionally indicated as corrections of order α 4 (N F = 1), where α is the fine structure constant) [11]. The cross section presented in [11] is valid for arbitrary values of the squared center of mass energy s and momentum transfer t. The full dependence of the crosssection on the electron and positron mass m was retained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By employing the results of [8,9], it was possible to complete the calculation of the virtual Bhabha scattering unpolarized differential cross-section, including the contribution of two-loop graphs involving a closed fermion loop (conventionally indicated as corrections of order α 4 (N F = 1), where α is the fine structure constant) [11]. The cross section presented in [11] is valid for arbitrary values of the squared center of mass energy s and momentum transfer t. The full dependence of the crosssection on the electron and positron mass m was retained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross section presented in [11] is valid for arbitrary values of the squared center of mass energy s and momentum transfer t. The full dependence of the crosssection on the electron and positron mass m was retained. In calculating the Feynman diagrams, both UV and IR divergences were regularized with the continuous D-dimensional regularization scheme [12], while the diagrams were evaluated analytically in [8,9] by means of the Laporta algorithm [13] and the differential equations technique for the evaluation of the master integrals [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together with the result of Refs. [6,7] for the corrections with the closed fermion loop insertions our result gives a complete expression for the two-loop virtual corrections. It should be incorporated into the Monte Carlo event generators to reduce the theoretical error in the luminosity determination at present and future electron-positron colliders below 0.1%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…However, this approximation is not sufficient since one has to keep a nonvanishing electron mass to make the result compatible with available Monte Carlo event generators [1]. Recently an important class of the two-loop corrections, which include at least one closed fermion loop, has been obtained for a finite electron mass [6] including the soft photon bremsstrahlung [7]. A similar evaluation of the purely photonic two-loop corrections is a challenging problem at the limit of present computational techniques [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is reasonable to expect that it can be safely ignored except in the terms where it acts as a cut-off for collinear divergencies, as it was done in obtaining the results of [20]. For the set of corrections obtained in [21] and [30], for which unapproximated analytic results are available, it is possible to determine the numerical relevance of the terms suppressed by positive powers of the ratio m 2 /s as a function of the beam energy. This analysis is performed in [30].…”
Section: The Small Mass Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%