2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jog.2006.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two lithospheric profiles across southern California derived from gravity and seismic data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The offset of the Moho at this locality may connect to thrusting along the Palos Verdes fault (see Figure ) and if so, then the mantle communication between the Moho and the surface is weaker here than along the NIFZ, based on the strength of the R/Ra ratio in the two areas (Figure ). Another study, based on gravity and seismic data, concludes the NIFZ is the southwest boundary between a thick section of ultramafic lower crust on the north and a thin section of oceanic crust to the south [see Romanyuk et al ., , Figure 8]. The abrupt lateral change in lithospheric material in the deep crust adjacent to the NIFZ is consistent with a deep‐seated conduit to the Moho along the NIFZ and the preservation of a paleo‐subduction boundary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The offset of the Moho at this locality may connect to thrusting along the Palos Verdes fault (see Figure ) and if so, then the mantle communication between the Moho and the surface is weaker here than along the NIFZ, based on the strength of the R/Ra ratio in the two areas (Figure ). Another study, based on gravity and seismic data, concludes the NIFZ is the southwest boundary between a thick section of ultramafic lower crust on the north and a thin section of oceanic crust to the south [see Romanyuk et al ., , Figure 8]. The abrupt lateral change in lithospheric material in the deep crust adjacent to the NIFZ is consistent with a deep‐seated conduit to the Moho along the NIFZ and the preservation of a paleo‐subduction boundary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our alternate gravity model of the continental slope of southern QCS is that of an abandoned transform fault (Figure 12). Shear zones of this width have been mapped across transform plate boundaries (e.g., line 88‐03, Figure 5) and typically have lower seismic velocities and by implication lower densities [ Stern and McBride , 1998; Wilson et al , 2004; Romanyuk et al , 2007]. Gravity interpretations are of course nonunique; calculating a successful alternate simply shows that previous models of this margin as a subduction zone cannot be used as definitive proof of tectonic interactions.…”
Section: Interpretation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some support for a density origin of the HVB from detailed 2D gravity and isostatic modeling by Romanyuk et al (2007), although the gravity expression of this deep body is weak. Biasi (2009) has interpreted the origins of high-velocity mantle anomalies in California, concluding, based on volumetric arguments, that they do not have local sources (they are too big), but are possibly downwelled lithospheric roots of the Sierra Nevada and Peninsular Ranges batholiths.…”
Section: Appendix Cmentioning
confidence: 99%