1969
DOI: 10.1080/00207216908938173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-line neuristor with active element in series and in parallel†

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9(f) shows various types of spiking behaviors achieved with different capacitance, indicating the versatility. It is worthwhile to point out that neuristors have been demonstrated previously using other voltage-controlled negative differential resistance devices such as tunnel junctions [180], [181]. These designs usually require nonscalable inductors to operate [180], [181], while Mott switches can be scaled down to nanometer regime.…”
Section: Neuromorphic Devices: Neuristorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9(f) shows various types of spiking behaviors achieved with different capacitance, indicating the versatility. It is worthwhile to point out that neuristors have been demonstrated previously using other voltage-controlled negative differential resistance devices such as tunnel junctions [180], [181]. These designs usually require nonscalable inductors to operate [180], [181], while Mott switches can be scaled down to nanometer regime.…”
Section: Neuromorphic Devices: Neuristorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worthwhile to point out that neuristors have been demonstrated previously using other voltage-controlled negative differential resistance devices such as tunnel junctions [180], [181]. These designs usually require nonscalable inductors to operate [180], [181], while Mott switches can be scaled down to nanometer regime. Although the capacitors used were very large due to the large parasitic capacitance of the test apparatus, lowering the capacitance not only leads to reduced device area but also helps to generate higher frequency spikes and will be an important design criterion for more realistic circuits.…”
Section: Neuromorphic Devices: Neuristorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological brains can perform computational tasks at an ∼100,000× efficiency compared to the digital computers. A typical biological neuron has a surface area of ∼10 μm 2 , spends ∼10 pJ energy to generate each spike, and operates at a frequency of ∼100 Hz, which translates to a power cost of ∼1 nW for biological systems. ,, The first set of efforts in emulating biological neurons dates back to 1960s following the FN model using voltage controlled NDR devices , paired with inductors to produce relaxation oscillations similar to neuronal spiking behavior. The inductor element is the main scaling bottleneck of this circuit implementation of spiking neuron, as coil-based passive inductors are difficult to fabricate at nanoscale with the required inductance values. The emergence of current-controlled NDR devices featuring metal–insulator phase transition materials has enabled generation of relaxation oscillations using capacitors, leading to considerable progress in artificial spiking neurons. There have been other approaches to producing NDR, such as band to band tunneling, resonant tunneling, Gunn effect, real space electron transfer in III–V heterostructures, body biasing of MOSFET, exploiting graphene’s unique dispersion relationship near its Dirac point, using trap-based recombination processes, redox behavior of molecular junctions, and multiple circuits. ,, Recently, we have shown that a graphene–silicon photodetector can show voltage-dependent NDR behavior under optical illumination while operating in the photovoltaic regime .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea was initially proposed more than 50 years ago and got widespread popularity with the works of Carver Mead. [13][14][15][16] Since then, CMOS-based circuitry has been successfully used to implement neuromorphic systems, allowing tunable and efficient neural networks. [17][18][19] However, CMOS-based components rely on multiple transistors and capacitors, making them complex and extensive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%