2018
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2017.2771465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Layered Mechanism of Online Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Conflict Detection and Resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[18] apply a speed change method to solve conflicts but are limited by frontal conflicts and uncertainties. In a similar way, [19], [20] use speed and heading changes restricted to 2D; hence they do not consider any altitude change. In the AgentFly project, [21], [22] propose decentralized algorithms for collision avoidance based on game theory, but they do not consider a realistic UTM setting with task allocation or static obstacles.…”
Section: B Conflict Detection and Resolution (Cdr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18] apply a speed change method to solve conflicts but are limited by frontal conflicts and uncertainties. In a similar way, [19], [20] use speed and heading changes restricted to 2D; hence they do not consider any altitude change. In the AgentFly project, [21], [22] propose decentralized algorithms for collision avoidance based on game theory, but they do not consider a realistic UTM setting with task allocation or static obstacles.…”
Section: B Conflict Detection and Resolution (Cdr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To handle flocking control with obstacle avoidance, work [22] proposes a UAV distributed flocking control algorithm based on the modified multi-objective pigeon-inspired optimization (MPIO), which considers both the hard constraints and the soft ones. Our previous works [23,24] formulate the conflict avoidance problem as a nonlinear optimization problem, and then use different methods to solve such an optimization problem. The work in [23] proposes a two-layered mechanism to guarantee safe separation, which finds the optimal heading change solutions with the vectorized stochastic parallel gradient descent-based method, and finds the optimal speed change solutions with a mixed integer linear programming model.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous works [23,24] formulate the conflict avoidance problem as a nonlinear optimization problem, and then use different methods to solve such an optimization problem. The work in [23] proposes a two-layered mechanism to guarantee safe separation, which finds the optimal heading change solutions with the vectorized stochastic parallel gradient descent-based method, and finds the optimal speed change solutions with a mixed integer linear programming model. The work in [24] uses the stochastic parallel gradient descent (SPGD) method to find the feasible initial solutions, and then uses the Sequential quadratic programming (SQP) algorithm to compute the local optimal solution.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of CDR is to optimize the flights of UAVs while keeping the safe separation among relevant UAVs in a time interval [ 0 , τ ] , where τ is the look-ahead time window. 5 The CDR methods could be classified into three levels according to τ . 6 The long-term CDR considers the safe separation among aircraft strategically in several hours, which is often accomplished before departure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%