1998
DOI: 10.1115/1.2791929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Interpretations of Rigidity in Rigid-Body Collisions

Abstract: We distinguish between, and discuss the applicability of, two levels of rigidity in rigid-body collision modeling. For rigidity in the strong force-response sense, collisional contact deformations must be highly localized. The bodies then move according to second-order rigid-body mechanics during the collision. Incremental collision laws and most collision models using continuum mechanics for the contact region depend on force-response rigidity. For rigidity in the weaker impulse-response sense, the deformatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Incremental laws start with the differential form of Eq. 1 (thus requiring stronger rigidity, see Chatterjee and Ruina, 1998a), and then hypothesize specific types of incremental contact behavior that vary from law to law; integration of the resulting differential equations up to a hypothesized termination criterion then determines the outcome of the collision. When needed, we assume that at least one of the objects is geometrically smooth at the contact point so a well defined tangent plane exists with normal n directed out from the reference object in the n or 1 direction.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Incremental laws start with the differential form of Eq. 1 (thus requiring stronger rigidity, see Chatterjee and Ruina, 1998a), and then hypothesize specific types of incremental contact behavior that vary from law to law; integration of the resulting differential equations up to a hypothesized termination criterion then determines the outcome of the collision. When needed, we assume that at least one of the objects is geometrically smooth at the contact point so a well defined tangent plane exists with normal n directed out from the reference object in the n or 1 direction.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algebraic laws attempt to describe the net collisional interaction by algebraic equations that relate pre-collision and post-collision quantities. Thus, algebraic laws are generally based on less stringent rigidity requirements than incremental laws (see e.g., Chatterjee and Ruina, 1998a). One interpretation of incremental calculations is that they are a means to calculate a reasonable net impulse and not a literal description of the true contact mechanics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear and angular momentum conservation generally demand that mechanical energy be lost in plastic collisions; where the energy goes depends on detailed non-rigid-body mechanics that do not effect the post-collisional rigid-body motions e.g. (Chatterjee and Ruina, Dec 1998). However, if the colliding points on two objects have the same velocity when they make plastic contact, then no energy is lost in that "collision" even though it is a plastic or sticking collision.…”
Section: Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of rigidity assumes a perfectly non-deformable body. Rigidity is an idealized view and per se not found in real nature [22,74]. On a microscopic level, even extremely hard bodies, such as diamonds, deform slightly when they collide with each other.…”
Section: Rigid Body Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%