2023
DOI: 10.1142/s021798492450115x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two innovative derivation methods of the Nernst equation without any additional assumptions

Shanhe Su,
Shihao Xia,
Tao Liang
et al.

Abstract: It is found that without any additional assumptions, Nernst’s equation can be re-deduced from the experimental data obtained from the thermodynamic systems at ultra-low temperatures, which is different from the derivation processes in textbooks and literature, and consequently, the physical content included by Nernst’s equation should not be referred to as Nernst’s postulate or Nernst’s theorem. It should be renamed as the Nernst statement. This discovery will play an important role in improving the theoretica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using those experimental results and introducing some assumptions, Nernst derived the heat theorem, which was later modified and generalized by Planck, Simon, and others [2] and became known as the Nernst postulate or Nernst theorem. Recently, it was found [30] that the derivation of the Nernst equation does not need those additional assumptions appearing in textbooks. The physical content included by Nernst's equation should not be referred to as Nernst's postulate or Nernst's theorem.…”
Section: Three Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using those experimental results and introducing some assumptions, Nernst derived the heat theorem, which was later modified and generalized by Planck, Simon, and others [2] and became known as the Nernst postulate or Nernst theorem. Recently, it was found [30] that the derivation of the Nernst equation does not need those additional assumptions appearing in textbooks. The physical content included by Nernst's equation should not be referred to as Nernst's postulate or Nernst's theorem.…”
Section: Three Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%