Two Higgs Doublet Model and model independent interpretation of neutral Higgs boson searches

Abbiendi, G.; Ackerstaff, K.; Ainsley, C.; Åkesson, P. F.; Alexander, G.; Allison, J.; Anderson, K. J.; Arcelli, S.; Asai, S.; Ashby, S. F.; Axen, D.; Azuelos, G.; Bailey, I.; Ball, A. H.; Barberio, E.; Barlow, R. J.; Baumann, S.; Behnke, T.; Bell, K. W.; Bella, G.; Bellerive, A.; Benelli, G.; Bentvelsen, S.; Bethke, S.; Biebel, O.; Bloodworth, I. J.; Boeriu, O.; Bock, P.; Böhme, J.; Bonacorsi, D.; Boutemeur, M.; Braibant, S.; Bright-Thomas, P.; Brigliadori, L.; Brown, R. M.; Burckhart, H.; Cammin, J.; Capiluppi, P.; Carnegie, R. K.; Carter, A. A.; Carter, J. R.; Chang, C. Y.; Charlton, D. G.; Clarke, P. E.L.; Clay, E.; Cohen, I.; Cooke, O. C.; Couchman, J.; Couyoumtzelis, C.; Coxe, R. L.; Csilling, Á.; Cuffiani, M.; Dado, S.; Dallavalle, G. M.; Dallison, S.; Roeck, A. De; Wolf, E. de; Dervan, P.; Desch, K.; Dienes, B.; Dixit, M. S.; Donkers, M.; Dubbert, J.; Duchovni, E.; Duckeck, G.; Duerdoth, I. P.; Estabrooks, P. G.; Etzion, E.; Fabbri, F.; Fanti, M.; Felď, L.; Ferrari, P.; Fiedler, F.; Fleck, I.; Ford, M.; Frey, A.; Fürtjes, A.; Futyan, D. I.; Gagnon, P.; Gary, J. W.; Gaycken, G.; Geich-Gimbel, Ch.; Giacomelli, G.; Giacomelli, P.; Glenzinskí, D.; Goldberg, J.; Grandi, C.; Graham, K.; Gross, E.; Grunhaus, J.; Gruwé, M.; Günther, P. O.; Hajdú, C.; Hanson, G.; Hansroul, M.; Hapke, M.; Harder, K.; Harel, A.; Harin-Dirac, M.; Hauke, A.; Hauschild, M.; Hawkes, C. M.; Hawkings, R. J.; Hemingway, R. J.; Hensel, C.; Herten, G.; Heuer, R. D.; Hill, J. C.; Höcker, A.; Hoffman, K. D.; Homer, R. J.; Honma, A. K.; Horváth, D.; Hossain, K. R.; Howard, Robert; Hüntemeyer, P.; Igo‐Kemenes, P.; Ishii, K.; Jacob, F. R.; Jawahery, A.; Jérémie, H.; Jones, C. R.; Jovanović, P.; Junk, T. R.; Kanaya, N.; Kanzaki, J.; Karapetian, G.; Karlen, D.; Kartvelishvili, V.; Kawagoe, K.; Kawamoto, T.; Keeler, R.; Kellogg, R. G.; Kennedy, B. W.; Kim, D. H.; Klein, K.; Klier, A.; Kluth, S.; Kobayashi, Tatsuo; Kobel, M.; Kokott, T. P.; Komamiya, S.; Kowalewski, R.; Kress, T.; Krieger, P.; Krogh, J. von; Kühl, T.; Küpper, M.; Kyberd, P.; Lafferty, G. D.; Landsman, H.; Lanske, D.; Lawson, I.; Layter, J. G.; Leins, A.; Lellouch, D.; Letts, J.; Levinson, L. J.; Liebisch, R.; Lillich, J.; List, B.; Littlewood, C.; Lloyd, A. W.; Lloyd, S. L.; Loebinger, F. K.; Long, G. D.; Losty, M. J.; Lu, J.; Ludwig, J.; Macchiolo, A.; Macpherson, A.; Mader, W. F.; Marcellini, S.; Marchant, T. E.; Martin, A. J.; Martin, J. P.; Martı́nez, G.; Mäshimo, T.; Mättig, P.; McDonald, W. J.; McKenna, J. A.; McMahon, T. J.; McPherson, R. A.; Meijers, F.; Mendez-Lorenzo, P.; Menges, W.; Merritt, F. S.; Mes, H.; Michelini, A.; Mihara, S.; Mikenberg, G.; Miller, D. J.; Mohr, W.; Montanari, A.; Mori, T.; Nagai, K.; Nakamura, I.; Neal, H.; Nisius, R.; O’Neale, S. W.; Oakham, F. G.; Odorici, F.; Ogren, H. O.; Oh, A.; Okpara, A.; Oreglia, M. J.; Orito, S.; Pásżtor, G.; Pater, J. R.; Patrick, G. N.; Patt, J.; Pfeifenschneider, P.; Pilcher, J. E.; Pinfold, J. L.; Plane, D. E.; Poli, B.; Polok, J.; Pooth, O.; Przybycień, M.; Quadt, A.; Rembser, C.; Renkel, P.; Rick, H.; Rodning, N.; Roney, J. M.; Rosati, S.; Roscoe, K.; Rossi, Antônio; Rozen, Y.; Runge, K.; Runólfsson, Ö.; Rust, D. R.; Sachs, K.; Saeki, T.; Sahr, O.; Sarkisyan, E. K.G.; Sbarra, C.; Schaile, A. D.; Schaile, O.; Scharff-Hansen, P.; Schröder, M.; Schumacher, M.; Schwick, C.; Scott, W. G.; Seuster, R.; Shears, T.; Shen, B. C.; Shepherd-Themistocleous, C. H.; Sherwood, P.; Siroli, G. P.; Skuja, A.; Smith, A. M.; Snow, G. A.; Sobie, R.; Söldner-Rembold, S.; Spagnolo, S.; Sproston, M.; Stahl, A.; Stephens, K.; Stoll, K.; Strom, D.; Ströhmer, R.; Stumpf, L.; Surrow, B.; Talbot, S. D.; Tarem, S.; Taylor, R. J.; Teuscher, R. J.; Thiergen, M.; Thomas, J. P.; Thomson, M. A.; Torrence, E.; Towers, S.; Toya, D.; Trefzger, T.; Trigger, I. M.; Trócsányi, Z. L.; Tsur, E.; Turner-Watson, M. F.; Ueda, I.; Vachon, B.; Vannerem, P.; Verzocchi, M.; Voss, H.; Vossebeld, J.; Waller, D.; Ward, C. P.; Ward, D. R.; Watkins, P. M.; Watson, A. T.; Watson, N. K.; Wells, P. S.; Wengler, T.; Wermes, N.; Wetterling, D.; White, J. S.; Wilson, G. W.; Wilson, J. A.; Wyatt, T. R.; Yamashita, Shinji; Zacek, V.; Zer-Zion, D.

doi:10.1007/s100520000544

Cited by 32 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Future upgrades of the analyses could attack these kinds of backgrounds by even better exploitation of all kinematic information, e.g. by testing various intermediate boson hypotheses in a kinematic fit [55] and/or by evaluating the matrix element probabilities for the signal and various background hypotheses on an event-by-event basis [56]. There are also some background events with tau leptons such as νντ μ with τ decaying to μ, but this contribution is negligible compared to the ones with exactly the signal final state.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prospects of measuring the branching fraction of the Higgs boson decaying into muon pairs at the International Linear Collider

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The prospects for measuring the branching fraction of $$H \rightarrow \mu ^{+} \mu ^{-}$$ H → μ + μ - at the International Linear Collider (ILC) have been evaluated based on a full detector simulation of the International Large Detector (ILD) concept, considering centre-of-mass energies ($$\sqrt{s}$$ s ) of 250 GeV and 500 GeV with two different beam polarisation configurations of $${\mathcal {P}} (e^{-}, e^{+}) = (-\,80{\%}, +\,30{\%})$$ P ( e - , e + ) = ( - 80 % , + 30 % ) and $$(+\,80{\%}, -\,30{\%})$$ ( + 80 % , - 30 % ) . For both $$\sqrt{s}$$ s cases, the two final states $$e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow q\overline{q}H$$ e + e - → q q ¯ H and $$e^{+} e^{-} \rightarrow \nu \overline{\nu }H$$ e + e - → ν ν ¯ H have been analyzed. For integrated luminosities of 2 $$\hbox {ab}^{-1}$$ ab - 1 at $$\sqrt{s} =250$$ s = 250 GeV and 4 $$\hbox {ab}^{-1}$$ ab - 1 at $$\sqrt{s} =500$$ s = 500 GeV, the combined precision on the branching fraction of $$H \rightarrow \mu ^{+} \mu ^{-}$$ H → μ + μ - is estimated to be 17%. The impact of the transverse momentum resolution for this analysis is also studied.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prospects of measuring the branching fraction of the Higgs boson decaying into muon pairs at the International Linear Collider

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Zh 1 , h 1 ! a 1 a 1 searches by LEP [32,33], the direct Ç ! a 1 searches by CLEO [34] and BABAR [35], and limits set by rare B !…”

Section: Nmssm Parameter Spacementioning

confidence: 99%

LHC discovery potential of the lightest NMSSM Higgs boson in theh1→a1a1→4μchannel

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We explore the potential of the Large Hadron Collider to observe the h 1 ! a 1 a 1 ! 4 signal from the lightest scalar Higgs boson (h 1 ) decaying into the two lightest pseudoscalar Higgs bosons (a 1 ), followed by their decays into four muons in the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model (NMSSM). The signature under study applies to the region of the NMSSM parameter space in which m a 1 < 2m , which has not been studied previously. In such a scenario, the suggested strategy of searching for a four-muon signal with the appropriate background suppression would provide a powerful method to discover the lightest CP-even and CP-odd NMSSM Higgs bosons h 1 and a 1 .

show abstract

“…However, a collider search for the neutral Higgs bosons in the framework of the THDM's rules out little masses for m A 0 . An OPAL analysis [26]…”

Section: Muon Anomalous Magnetic Dipole Momentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dipole moments of charged leptons in the THDM-III with textures

Arroyo-Ureña¹,

Diaz²

2016

J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We study the magnetic and weak magnetic dipole moments of charged leptons in the framework of the Two Higgs Doublet Model type III (THDM-III) with four zero textures. We first analyze the possibility that the discrepancy between the experimental measurements and the theoretical prediction of the muon anomalous magnetic dipole moment (aµ) in the Standard Model (SM) can be explained in the context of the model and then find values for the parameters of the THDM-III: neutral and charged Higgs boson masses (mH , m H ± ), mixing angles (α, β), CP-violating angles θ1, θ2 and an additional parameter arising from the mass matrix (γ f ), for which a correspondence between theory and experiment is possible. We use a T HDM −III µ and current low energy processes K −K mixing, B 0 s → µμ, τ → µµμ, µ → eeē, τ → µγ, τ → eγ, µ → eγ, b → sγ, B → D(D * )τ ν and the rare higgs decay h → τ µ in order to determine the allowed parameter space of THDM-III and from these we give a prediction for the magnetic and weak magnetic dipole moment of charged leptons, in particular of the τ lepton. The obtained magnetic dipole moment of the τ lepton is of the order of O(10 −8 − 10 −7 ) and the weak magnetic is of the order O(10 −10 − 10 −7 ).

show abstract

Two Higgs Doublet Model and model independent interpretation of neutral Higgs boson searches

Abstract: For the first time, the 2HDM(II) parameter space is explored in a detailed scan, and new flavour independent analyses are applied to examine regions in which the neutral Higgs bosons decay predominantly into light quarks or gluons. Model-independent limits are also given.

Cited by 32 publications

References 24 publications

Prospects of measuring the branching fraction of the Higgs boson decaying into muon pairs at the International Linear Collider

Prospects of measuring the branching fraction of the Higgs boson decaying into muon pairs at the International Linear Collider

LHC discovery potential of the lightest NMSSM Higgs boson in theh1→a1a1→4μchannel

Dipole moments of charged leptons in the THDM-III with textures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About