2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02055.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two heads are better than one? How to effectively use two interviewers to elicit cues to deception

Abstract: Background.We examined the effect of a second interviewer's demeanour on cues to deception. We predicted that a supportive demeanour would be the most beneficial for eliciting verbal cues to deceit, as it would encourage truth tellers, but not liars, to say more. In addition, we examined the extent to which interviewees deliberately made eye contact with the interviewers. Liars take their credibility less for granted than truth tellers, and therefore have a greater drive to be convincing. Liars are thus more l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical research has supported this premise, and methods to encourage interviewees to say more discussed in the training include the use of (1) a model statement (playing the participant a very detailed statement as an example) (Leal et al ., ); (2) a supportive interviewer (e.g. Mann et al ., ; Shaw, Vrij, Mann, Leal, & Hillman, ); (3) deliberate mimicry of the interviewee (Shaw et al ., ); and (4) drawings (e.g. Roos af Hjelmsäter, Öhman, Granhag, & Vrij, ; Vrij et al ., ()).…”
Section: The Cognitive Lie Detection Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical research has supported this premise, and methods to encourage interviewees to say more discussed in the training include the use of (1) a model statement (playing the participant a very detailed statement as an example) (Leal et al ., ); (2) a supportive interviewer (e.g. Mann et al ., ; Shaw, Vrij, Mann, Leal, & Hillman, ); (3) deliberate mimicry of the interviewee (Shaw et al ., ); and (4) drawings (e.g. Roos af Hjelmsäter, Öhman, Granhag, & Vrij, ; Vrij et al ., ()).…”
Section: The Cognitive Lie Detection Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may wish to avoid possible questions the mime artist will ask or they may simply not be in a chatty and cooperative mood. Liars often experience a more negative effect than truth tellers and this could make them more reluctant to engage in conversations (DePaulo et al, 2003;Mann et al, 2013;. The same reasons may also make liars reluctant to show photographs if asked.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The usage of multiple interviewers is a strongly advised approach to elicit meaningful responses from the interviewee and to detect inconsistencies and digressions better during the interview and respond to it (Kincaid and Bright, 1957;Huber and Power, 1985;Mann et al, 2013). Verbatim interview transcripts were produced by a professional third-party service to establish the phenomena in a credible way (Griggs, 1987;Riege, 2003).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%