2014
DOI: 10.1635/053.163.0105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two halves make a Holotype: two hundred years between discoveries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They did not attempt any further taxonomic attribution. The morphology of the humerus of IGVR 91032 is typical for the Chelonioidea (the thalassic type humeri as described by Weiland, 1900; see also Młynarsky, 1976;Hirayama, 1994Hirayama, , 1997Wyneken, 2001;Parris et al, 2014): longer than femur, with a nearly straight shaft, and with the lateral process located distal to the caput humeri (Chesi and Delfino, 2007;Hirayama, 1994). Other features supporting the referral to the Chelonioidea, besides the fact that the specimen is preserved in marine deposits, are elongated metapodials and phalanges of digits I-III lacking movable articulations and scute sulci on plastron absent (Chesi and Delfino, 2007;Hirayama, 1994Hirayama, , 1998Lehman and Tomlinson, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They did not attempt any further taxonomic attribution. The morphology of the humerus of IGVR 91032 is typical for the Chelonioidea (the thalassic type humeri as described by Weiland, 1900; see also Młynarsky, 1976;Hirayama, 1994Hirayama, , 1997Wyneken, 2001;Parris et al, 2014): longer than femur, with a nearly straight shaft, and with the lateral process located distal to the caput humeri (Chesi and Delfino, 2007;Hirayama, 1994). Other features supporting the referral to the Chelonioidea, besides the fact that the specimen is preserved in marine deposits, are elongated metapodials and phalanges of digits I-III lacking movable articulations and scute sulci on plastron absent (Chesi and Delfino, 2007;Hirayama, 1994Hirayama, , 1998Lehman and Tomlinson, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…and the width of their cusp in anterior view were taken by a micrometer mounted on a Leica MZ16 stereomicroscope. Capellini (1884Capellini ( , 1898, Hay (1908), Hirayama (1992Hirayama ( , 1994Hirayama ( , 1997Hirayama ( and 1998, Kapuścińska and Machalski (2015), Lehman and Tomlinson (2004), Młynarsky (1976), Mulder (2003, Parris et al (2014), Villa et al (2014), Wieland (1900Wieland ( , 1906, Wyneken (2001Wyneken ( , 2003, Zangerl and Sloan (1960) were used for the comparison and taxonomic identification of the turtle remains. Shark body length (TL) was estimated from individual vertebral centrum diameter (CD) using the following formulas taken from Shimada (2008) and Gottfried et al (1996) respectively).…”
Section: Shark and Turtlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based solely on humeral morphology, A . mortoni has been hypothesized as a member of either Protostegidae [ 1 , 62 ] or Cheloniidae [ 63 ] but until more material of this species is recovered and the species’ phylogenetic placement formally tested, we conservatively exclude this specimen from any discussions pertaining to the cladistics or paleobiogeography of Cretaceous chelonioids sensu stricto given the possibility that A . mortoni may not belong to this clade.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%